<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "Arkham Horror Statistics"]]></title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/list/10.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "Arkham Horror Statistics"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hello,<br /> <br /> I have been playing Arkham Horror for a long time now and I have been always interested about the statistics of our games (what combinations of GOOs / heralds we defeated and so on).<br /> <br /> Now, with the Kingsport Horror and the introduction of Guardians, the different possibilities for each game are incredible high.<br /> <br /> That is why I have put together a quick and dirty form with Google docs to record the results of every game of Arkham Horror. I plan to create a web site showing different statistics and reports with the data collected.<br /> <br /> If you wish to enter data from your own sessions, please, do it at:<br /> <br /> <a class="snap_shots" href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?key=pYsj88WqxwxBt5mRULVwXbw&email=true" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?key=pYsj88WqxwxBt5mRULVwXbw&email=true</a><br /> <br /> Also, if you see something not correct in the form or you think that some information is missing, please don't hesitate to let me know.<br /> <br /> Thanks a lot for your submissions!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/151945.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/151945.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Jun 2008 05:34:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Atlach-Nacha is missing from the Ancient One list. I just beat it twice, and lost once this weekend.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/152048.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/152048.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:06:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ deejay]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for spotting that!<br /> <br /> I have updated the form, so you should be able to enter your games now.<br /> <br /> Thanks again!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/152053.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/152053.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:14:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You need some victory criteria:<br /> <br /> • Victory by [i]Sacrifices to Make[/i] mission<br /> <br /> You might also consider adding "Other" for the heralds and guardians, in case someone is using a home-made, as I plan to have two or three homemade heralds (no guardians though).<br /> But don't add "other" for Ancient Ones, because they're the focus of this study. Anyone using a homemade AO probably should not be posting statistics on this page.<br /> <br /> You should have some other check boxes for "optional" material:<br /> <br /> • Used "Three Acts" variant<br /> • Used "Epic Final Battle" variant<br /> <br /> Finally, you should vary how the game was lost:<br /> <br /> • Normal loss (final combat; this includes awakening Azathoth)<br /> • Maybe have a "loss by [i]End Of Everything[/i] epic battle card"<br /> • Loss by Shudde M'ell earthquake<br /> • Loss by "Joining the Winning Team" mission<br /> • Loss by Act III<br /> • Loss by forfeit, perhaps? Sometimes the discouragement of a hopeless situation is overwhelming.<br /> <br /> Maybe you could also have an optional section where players can enter their final score so that you can have an idea by how closely the players won (or lost).]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/152328.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/152328.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:50:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tibs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ tibs, thanks for your comments, tomorrow I will be updating the form according to some of your input.<br /> <br /> And also, thanks to all the people that is submitting results, there are 20 sessions recorded already!!!<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/152642.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/152642.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:44:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You might also want to have a separate bullet point list for using PART of an expansion. For example, I played COTDP and afterwards left the allies in, but only the allies.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/152909.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/152909.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:07:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Overdroid]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ 'Ello mate. I'm not sure exactly why, but this statistics bit of yours is really tickling my fancy. And I rather like the suggestions that are being thrown around. Can't wait to see it evolve.<br /> <br /> Although. ~cough~ I accidentally added mine twice... I don't suppose you could just delete one, could you? It was a game against Yig, under the name Indrid1. That was the first recent game I could remember fully enough to put on the list.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153047.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153047.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:07:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ AngelusNoir]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Sounds cool. I would request one for won by "Walking the Lay Lines"  (I've done it once). True its the same as closing the gates but it's doing it in a special way. <br /> <br /> At the moment that's the only thing that comes to mind but if I think of more I'll add them.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153073.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153073.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:34:01]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ allstar64]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Yea, I put in the statistics of my last three games. I'll be sure to keep better track now.<br /> <br /> -Rob]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153117.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153117.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:26:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Acebob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Guys, I have started creating some stored procedures to extract information from<br /> the data received. This are very basic ones, but I wanted to share with you <br /> anyway. More complex reports will be coming in the future.<br /> <br /> Also, I plan to update the form during today.<br /> <br /> The creation of the web site to display all this information will have to wait <br /> until, at least, next week (not having time right now).<br /> <br /> <br /> Based on 36 game sessions.<br /> <br /> TOP GOOs (GOOs most used in the games)<br /> Atlach-Nacha		4	 11.11%<br /> Nyarlathotep		4	 11.11%<br /> Yig				4	 11.11%<br /> Ithaqua			3	  8.33%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	3	  8.33%<br /> Tsathoggua			3	  8.33%<br /> Cthulhu					3	  8.33%<br /> Glaaki					2	  5.56%<br /> Hastur					2	  5.56%<br /> Azathoth				2	  5.56%<br /> Y'Golonac				2	  5.56%<br /> Yibb-Tstll			2	  5.56%<br /> Shudde M'ell		2	  5.56%<br /> <br /> A 66,67% of the games didn't have an herald. For the games that had it, these <br /> are the Top Ones:<br /> <br /> The Dark Pharaoh		4	 33.33%<br /> The Green Flame			4	 33.33%<br /> The King in Yellow	2	 16.67%<br /> The Nemesis Moon		1	  8.33%<br /> The Dunwich Profecy	1	  8.33%<br /> <br /> A 72.22% of the games didn't use a guardian. For the remaining sessions, this is<br /> the breakdown:<br /> <br /> Bast		5	 50.00%<br /> Hypnos	3	 30.00%<br /> Nodens	2	 20.00%<br /> <br /> <br /> The average number of investigators was 3 (rather low, I think).<br /> <br /> Finally, an overview of the game results; as you can see, almost half of the <br /> games were lost, which sound good to me. Also, most of the games were won by the <br /> final combat, which is the weakest victory type in my opinion:<br /> <br /> Defeat	                 17	 47.22%<br /> Victory by Final Combat	  8	 22.22%<br /> Victory by seals 	        7	 19.44%<br /> Victory by closing gates	4	 11.11%<br /> <br /> And last, but not least, a porcentage of investigator defeats per GOO. This report<br /> still doesn't take into account the Herald / Guardian combinations, but I will<br /> work on that in the next days:<br /> <br /> Glaaki					100.00%<br /> Y'Golonac				100.00%<br /> Tsathoggua 			66.67%<br /> Azathoth				50.00%<br /> Atlach-Nacha		50.00%<br /> Nyarlathotep		50.00%<br /> Yig							50.00%<br /> Shudde M'ell		50.00%<br /> Ithaqua					33.33%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	33.33%<br /> Cthulhu					33.33%<br /> Yibb-Tstll			0%<br /> Hastur					0%<br /> <br /> Glaaki and Y'Golonac are the only ones that remains unbeaten. I am surprised <br /> with having Yig with better performance than Cthulhu, but I think time will<br /> level out this.<br /> <br /> This is everything at the moment. Keep posting your suggestions and game results<br /> and, if you are willing to see an specific report, just let me know and I will <br /> see what I can do.<br /> <br /> PS: I just noticed that there was a duplicated session by AngelusNoir against <br /> Yig <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /> I have deleted it, but the reports above still contain that information [<br /> No time to rerun them right now, sorry]. The next reports generated will not <br /> include that info...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153339.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153339.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:01:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Maybe you can also include the investigators ? <br /> Then we can see which investigators are the best. <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153483.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153483.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:28:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ rhaak]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hello,<br /> <br /> I have updated the form, with the suggested "game results", along with a new section of "Miscellaneous Facts"... This part is not so important for the statistics, but it is fun anyway. <br /> <br /> One comment about this: Right now I don't have the game with me, so I can't check the name of the "Condition Cards" (I think they are called like that), but surelly you know what I am referring to: "Darke's Blessing"?, the one in the library, the one in the newspaper...<br /> <br /> Feel free to suggest any new miscellaneous facts!<br /> <br /> About the different parts of the expansions, I don't think I am going to include that, it will be a lot of options and, if for instance, you are using only the "Dark Pharaoh" Allies, I don't think it has a big impact in the game results. So, if you are using the complete expansion or most of it, mark it, otherwise leave it blank.<br /> <br /> Cheers!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153558.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153558.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:28:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I noticed that you updated the form with "Walking the Ley Lines" as a victory condition, and not "Sacrifices to Make." [i]Sacrifices[/i] is in and of itself a unique victory condition, while completing Ley Lines doesn't necessarily result in a victory, and if it does it's technically a victory by "all gates closed."<br /> <br /> You should probably change "Walking the Ley Lines" to "Sacrifices to Make."<br /> <br /> Edit: I don't suppose there is a way to colorize each row on the results so that it's red for overall defeat, and green for overall victory? Or at the very least to move the victory/defeat result column so that it's right nect to the Ancient One column, or right after Guardian? It would make the table easier to read.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153605.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153605.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:01:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tibs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=tibs]I noticed that you updated the form with "Walking the Ley Lines" as a victory condition, and not "Sacrifices to Make." [i]Sacrifices[/i] is in and of itself a unique victory condition, while completing Ley Lines doesn't necessarily result in a victory, and if it does it's technically a victory by "all gates closed."<br /> <br /> You should probably change "Walking the Ley Lines" to "Sacrifices to Make."<br /> <br /> Edit: I don't suppose there is a way to colorize each row on the results so that it's red for overall defeat, and green for overall victory? Or at the very least to move the victory/defeat result column so that it's right nect to the Ancient One column, or right after Guardian? It would make the table easier to read.[/quote]<br /> <br /> You are completely right, I didn't have the opportunity to check the cards and that is why I took the wrong card name...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153612.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153612.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:08:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'd like to see the score of the game.<br /> Tasks and missions completed?<br /> <br /> Edit: I mis entered my game.  We had 3 investigators and 2 were devoured and replaced.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153651.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153651.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:38:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mageith]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=mageith]I'd like to see the score of the game.<br /> Tasks and missions completed?<br /> <br /> Edit: I mis entered my game.  We had 3 investigators and 2 were devoured and replaced.[/quote]<br /> <br /> Hi,<br /> <br /> I will include the score. I usually don't calculate it myself, it is just a number, right? Also, will look into tasks and missions.<br /> <br /> About your game, I have corrected it... but, which Condition Card did you activate in that game? I will include the name of each one of the 4 existing ones.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153710.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153710.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:17:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Thanks.<br /> <br /> Coded messages.<br /> <br /> There's lots of factors to the game score and most of them are not in your data base.  You'd have to depend on the players to calculate the score and input it, I think.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153776.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/153776.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:01:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mageith]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Updated with 3 more battles.<br /> <br /> Atlach-Nacha was much easier than expect in epic combat. Yog, much more difficult. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/154709.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/154709.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:14:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Acebob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi again, I have an update for the stats:<br /> <br /> 60 sessions recorded so far, Nyarlathotep is the most popular GOO and Eihort the least popular one, as shown in this table. What is doing Nyarlathotep so popular? The Masks?:<br /> <br /> Nyarlathotep	 11.67%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	 10.00%<br /> Y'Golonac	  8.33%<br /> Yig	  8.33%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	  8.33%<br /> Cthulhu	  8.33%<br /> Ithaqua	  6.67%<br /> Shudde M'ell	  6.67%<br /> Tsathoggua	  5.00%<br /> Abhoth	  5.00%<br /> Glaaki	  5.00%<br /> Hastur	  5.00%<br /> Azathoth	  3.33%<br /> Yog Sothoth	  3.33%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	  3.33%<br /> Eihort	  1.67%<br /> <br /> Most of the sessions were played without an Herald (58,33%). Between the games played with Herald, The King in Yellow is clearly the most popular one, and I can see why:<br /> <br /> The King in Yellow	 40.00%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 20.00%<br /> The Green Flame	 20.00%<br /> The Nemesis Moon	 12.00%<br /> The Dunwich Profecy	  8.00%<br /> <br /> Talking about guardians, only a 30% of games were using them, I guess not enough people have the Kingsport expansion yet. Nodens is the less popular one (why? I don't have the expansion yet, but the blessings sound fun):<br /> <br /> Bast	 38.89%<br /> Hypnos	 38.89%<br /> Nodens	 22.22%<br /> <br /> The defeat ratio has decreased, now it is only a 35% of the games. The victories are still mainly obtained by the final combat and, as I expected, victories by closing gates are going down:<br /> <br /> Defeat (During Final Combat)	 35.00%<br /> Victory by Final Combat	 33.33%<br /> Victory by seals	 23.33%<br /> Victory by closing gates	  8.33%<br /> <br /> About the GOO Performance (Percentage of sessions the GOO is causing defeats), there is a triple tie between the three GOOs that came with Dunwich Horror Expansion! Shub-Niggurath is the weakest one and Yig is now in a tie with Cthulhu.<br /> <br /> Tsathoggua	 66.67%<br /> Abhoth	 66.67%<br /> Glaaki	 66.67%<br /> Y'Golonac	 60.00%<br /> Shudde M'ell	 50.00%<br /> Azathoth	 50.00%<br /> Yog Sothoth	 50.00%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	 40.00%<br /> Nyarlathotep	 28.57%<br /> Ithaqua	 25.00%<br /> Cthulhu	 20.00%<br /> Yig	 20.00%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	 16.67%<br /> <br /> Finally, a new report: percentage of defeats for games without herald and guardian, with herald but not guardian, with guardian but no herald and with both, herald and guardian. Columns are "type of game", "number of sessions recorded", "percentage of defeats":<br /> <br /> Herald - Guardian	11	 27.27%<br /> Herald - No Guardian	14	 35.71%<br /> No Herald - Guardian	7	 14.29%<br /> No Herald - No Guardian	28	 42.86%<br /> <br /> That's all for the moment.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/154791.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/154791.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:56:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Another stat, maybe this one can help you to decide what GOO / herald combination you want to fight in your next game. This is a report of the combinations  recorded of Goos and heralds, along with the percentage of times this combination has defeated the investigators. For example, Abhoth + KiY has not been defeated yet (Interestingly, according to my records, my own group lost two times to that combination in the past.)<br /> <br /> Abhoth	The King in Yellow	100.00%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	The Nemesis Moon	100.00%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	The Green Flame	100.00%<br /> Tsathoggua	The Green Flame	100.00%<br /> Tsathoggua	The King in Yellow	100.00%<br /> Y'Golonac	The Green Flame	100.00%<br /> Shudde M'ell	The King in Yellow	 50.00%<br /> Y'Golonac	The King in Yellow	 50.00%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	The Green Flame	 33.33%<br /> Hastur	The King in Yellow	 33.33%<br /> Nyarlathotep	The Dark Pharaoh	 33.33%<br /> <br /> Will you try one of the "unbeaten" combinations next time?<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/156468.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/156468.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:30:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for these percentile outputs. Personally, I think it'll still take a while for the stats on the Kingsport Ancient ones and heralds to realistically represent their actual mettle in comparison to the other ancient ones, since it is new and all. Also, the two downloadable Heralds will likely see less use than the King in Yellow and the new Kingsport ones, just for being downloads.<br /> <br /> Added all games I've ever taken part in on which I still had a [i]clear[/i] grasp of what went on during the game (it's only a fraction of the games I've ever played, but I didn't recall the ancient one and herald combos on most of those, so I left them out, only adding the ones which I still knew 100%).<br /> <br /> Again, thanks for this statistics sheet/thread.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/156805.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/156805.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:12:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Yea, its a great effort and cause, but I would be more concerned with the numbers once we have hundreds of games in. <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/157606.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/157606.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:25:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Acebob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think you should add a final doom factor for the games won outside of final battle, to indicate how long the game was. <br /> Also, an indicator for whether investigators were random, selected, or selected to especially target or be targeted by the GOO. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/157902.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/157902.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:08:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ deejay]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I have update the entry form with some of the suggestions:<br /> <br /> - The final score as suggested from maggeith.<br /> - From deejay I have included the method of selection of investigators and also the "doom factor". [Usually in my group, we choose between two or three random investigators before knowing the GOO, I will include this as Random, as I don't think it makes too much difference].<br /> <br /> @Acebob<br /> <br /> Of course, you are right, we need a lot more of game sessions to be able to extract some true information from the numbers... it will all depend if the people keeps posting results or not. At the moment, the feedback is quite good, almost one hundred sessions in less than one week!  I wonder who will be the most dangerous GOO in, let's say, one month.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> One last comment, as you surely have already noticed, English is not my mother language, so if you see something wrong in the form, please, let me know so I can correct it. Thanks!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/157918.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/157918.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:38:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=MCFlainez]One last comment, as you surely have already noticed, English is not my mother language, so if you see something wrong in the form, please, let me know so I can correct it. Thanks![/quote]<br /> In that case, the Heralds should read as their real names:<br /> <br /> The Dark Pharaoh<br /> The Dunwich Horror<br /> The King in Yellow<br /> Ghroth<br /> Tulzscha]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/158264.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/158264.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:32:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tibs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The four condition cards are:<br /> <br /> Coded Messages<br /> Darke's Blessing<br /> Rare Book Collection<br /> Velma's Gratitude<br /> <br /> You should have "number of investigators retired," or change the number devoured field to devoured/retired.<br /> <br /> You should have a check box for "Epic Battle" variant.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/158950.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/158950.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:15:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tibs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ After one week, there are 132 sessions recorded.<br /> <br /> Azathoth and Nyarlathotep are the most popular GOOs:<br /> <br /> GOO	/ Percentage of Sessions<br /> Azathoth	  9.09%<br /> Nyarlathotep	  9.09%<br /> Y'Golonac	  8.33%<br /> Yig	  8.33%<br /> Cthulhu	  8.33%<br /> Hastur	  7.58%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	  6.06%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	  6.06%<br /> Shudde M'ell	  5.30%<br /> Ithaqua	  5.30%<br /> Eihort	  5.30%<br /> Glaaki	  5.30%<br /> Yog Sothoth	  4.55%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	  3.79%<br /> Tsathoggua	  3.79%<br /> Abhoth	  3.79%<br /> <br /> 62,88 % of the games were played without an Herald. The "download-and-print" Heralds are clearly the lesast popular:<br /> <br /> Herald /Percentage of session (only among the games that used herald):<br /> The King in Yellow	 32.65%<br /> Ghroth	 24.49%<br /> Tulzscha	 22.45%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 10.20%<br /> The Dunwich Horror	 10.20%<br /> <br /> 69,70% of the games did not use any guardian. Bast is clearly the preferred one:<br /> <br /> Guardian /Percentage of session (only among the games that used guardian):<br /> Bast	 40.00%<br /> Nodens	 32.50%<br /> Hypnos	 27.50%<br /> <br /> A bit more than 40% of the sessions ended with investigator defeat, here it is the game result breakdown:<br /> <br /> Game result / Percentage of sessions that ended this way<br /> Defeat (During Final Combat)	 38.64%<br /> Victory by Final Combat	 25.76%<br /> Victory by seals	 21.97%<br /> Victory by closing gates	 10.61%<br /> Defeat by Act III (King in Yellow)	  1.52%<br /> Defeat by Earthquake (Shudde M'ell)	  0.76%<br /> Defeat by Forfeit (Game not ended)	  0.76%<br /> <br /> The most dangerous GOO seems to be Y'Golonac, with more than 60% of the games where it was used ending with investigator defeat. Ithaqua is right now the weakest one.<br /> <br /> GOO / Percentage of times the GOO won over the investigators.<br /> Y'Golonac	 63.64%<br /> Tsathoggua	 60.00%<br /> Abhoth	 60.00%<br /> Shudde M'ell	 57.14%<br /> Eihort	 57.14%<br /> Glaaki	 57.14%<br /> Azathoth	 50.00%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	 50.00%<br /> Yig	 45.45%<br /> Cthulhu	 36.36%<br /> Yog Sothoth	 33.33%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	 25.00%<br /> Nyarlathotep	 25.00%<br /> Hastur	 20.00%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	 20.00%<br /> Ithaqua	 14.29%<br /> <br /> About GOO / Herald combinations, there is still a big number of possibilities that has not been yet defeated by the investigators, here you have the numbers:<br /> <br /> GOO / Herald / Percentage of times the investigators were defeated.<br /> Abhoth	The King in Yellow	100.00%<br /> Eihort	Ghroth	100.00%<br /> Glaaki	Ghroth	100.00%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	Tulzscha	100.00%<br /> Shudde M'ell	The Dunwich Horror	100.00%<br /> Tsathoggua	The King in Yellow	100.00%<br /> Tsathoggua	Tulzscha	100.00%<br /> Y'Golonac	Tulzscha	100.00%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	Ghroth	 66.67%<br /> Y'Golonac	The King in Yellow	 66.67%<br /> Azathoth	Ghroth	 50.00%<br /> Cthulhu	The Dunwich Horror	 50.00%<br /> Eihort	Tulzscha	 50.00%<br /> Shudde M'ell	The King in Yellow	 50.00%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	Tulzscha	 33.33%<br /> Nyarlathotep	The Dark Pharaoh	 33.33%<br /> Hastur	The King in Yellow	 20.00%<br /> <br /> About the Herald / guardian combinations and the impact in the number of investigators defeats, gere you have the numbers:<br /> <br /> Type of game / number of sessions/ percentage of investigators defeat.<br /> Herald - Guardian	29	 48.28%<br /> Herald - No Guardian	20	 35.00%<br /> No Herald - Guardian	11	 18.18%<br /> No Herald - No Guardian	72	 44.44%<br /> <br /> One new stat: Percentage of use of each expansion, as you can see, The Dark Pharaoh is the least used one:<br /> <br /> Dunwich Horror	 47.73%<br /> Kingsport Horror	 42.42%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 33.33%<br /> The Yellow King	 42.42%<br /> <br /> <br /> Hopefully, during this week I will put live a web site to store and present all these stats in a more user-friendly way.<br /> <br /> Thanks for all the submissions.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/160720.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/160720.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Jun 2008 04:45:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Now those numbers are beginning to look pretty useful - I'm particularly surprised about Azathoth's and Nyarlathotep's popularity though.<br /> <br /> I've thought of another thing you could add: Whether or not the Beloved of Bast cards were collected in a game. This seems to be an exceedingly rare circumstance. Also, silver twilight lodge membership cards. Sure, the cultist starts with one, but I've only ever had two games where someone obtained a membership during the game.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/160994.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/160994.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:17:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Victimizer]Now those numbers are beginning to look pretty useful - I'm particularly surprised about Azathoth's and Nyarlathotep's popularity though.<br /> <br /> I've thought of another thing you could add: Whether or not the Beloved of Bast cards were collected in a game. This seems to be an exceedingly rare circumstance.[/quote]<br /> Maybe even a "became Changed" checkbox. I still have no idea what that does, nor do I know about the Bast cards, but I hear that they are good times for the whole family.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/161055.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/161055.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:01:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tibs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi,<br /> <br /> Just to let you know that I have updated the entry form to include all the "jobs" the investigators can get (as previously suggested).<br /> <br /> Also, during these days I am not posting new reports because I am working on the website to host all this information. Expect to have it ready on next Monday.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/165376.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/165376.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:38:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <br /> Awesome, looking forward to that!<br /> <br /> Also: I'm not sure if you thought it was relevant or not, but the twilight lodge membership & beloved of bast cards are still not options on the sheet, so just pointing that out in case you missed it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/165697.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/165697.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:34:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ MCF,<br /> <br /> FFG is forming a AH league, which includes sending FFG some AO and Investigator stats. Maybe the league organizer would be interested in your statistics forms?<br /> <br /> <a class="snap_shots" href="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ah_league.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ah_league.html</a><br /> <br /> <br /> aka. Washu! ^O^]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/166368.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/166368.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:14:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ced1106]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ @Victimizer:<br /> <br /> Thanks for the reminder, I completelly forgot about those. Now they are in.<br /> <br /> @ced116:<br /> <br /> Interesting, I didn't know that. It looks to me that each scenario will have special rules that will deviate from the standard game, but I don't know. Anyway I will contact JR Godwin to see if this can be usefull in some way.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/166609.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/166609.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:11:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hello all,<br /> <br /> At the end I didn't find time this weekend to work on the website, so I provide here the statistics including the last games.<br /> <br /> There are more than 200 recorded, exactly 218.<br /> <br /> Azathoth and Nyarlathotep are still the most used GOOs. Cthulhu has risen to the third place and Abboth is no longer the least used one:<br /> <br /> GOO	/ Percentage of Sessions<br /> Azathoth	 10.09%<br /> Nyarlathotep	 10.09%<br /> Cthulhu	  8.26%<br /> Hastur	  7.80%<br /> Yig	  7.80%<br /> Shudde M'ell	  6.42%<br /> Y'Golonac	  6.42%<br /> Ithaqua	  5.96%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	  5.96%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	  5.05%<br /> Abhoth	  4.59%<br /> Yog Sothoth	  4.59%<br /> Glaaki	  4.59%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	  4.13%<br /> Tsathoggua	  4.13%<br /> Eihort	  4.13%<br /> <br /> The percentage of games played without heralds is decreasing: from 62,88 % last week to the current  57.80%. About the Heralds themselves, there are no important changes:<br /> <br /> Herald /Percentage of session (only among the games that used herald):<br /> The King in Yellow	 27.17%<br /> Tulzscha	 25.00%<br /> Ghroth	 23.91%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 11.96%<br /> The Dunwich Horror	 11.96%<br /> <br /> The percentage of games played without guardians is also decreasing: from 69,70% last week to the current 61.93%. Nodens has taken the lead now (last week Bast was leading), and the numbers are much more closer this week. <br /> <br /> Guardian /Percentage of session (only among the games that used guardian):<br /> Nodens	 34.94%<br /> Bast	 33.73%<br /> Hypnos	 31.33%<br /> <br /> The Win/Defeat ratio is more or less stable with around 40% of the games ending with investigator defeats. The breakdown of the results shows a boost for the "Victory by Seals" option:<br /> <br /> Game result / Percentage of sessions that ended this way<br /> Defeat (During Final Combat)	 39.91%<br /> Victory by seals	 23.85%<br /> Victory by Final Combat	 23.39%<br /> Victory by closing gates	  9.63%<br /> Defeat by Forfeit (Game not ended)	  1.38%<br /> Defeat by Act III (King in Yellow)	  0.92%<br /> Defeat by Earthquake (Shudde M'ell)	  0.92%<br /> <br /> About the GOO Performance, Y'Golonac is still the most dangerous one. Poor Nyarlathotep is right now the weakest one. There are three GOOs that have exactly a 50% of defeats, right now:<br /> <br /> GOO / Percentage of times the GOO won over the investigators.<br /> Y'Golonac	 64.29%<br /> Glaaki	 60.00%<br /> Tsathoggua	 55.56%<br /> Eihort	 55.56%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	 54.55%<br /> Abhoth	 50.00%<br /> Yog Sothoth	 50.00%<br /> Shudde M'ell	 50.00%<br /> Cthulhu	 44.44%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	 44.44%<br /> Yig	 41.18%<br /> Hastur	 35.29%<br /> Azathoth	 31.82%<br /> Ithaqua	 30.77%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	 30.77%<br /> Nyarlathotep	 27.27%<br /> <br /> About the GOO / Herald combinations, I am happy to announce that user "Feroz" has defeated the previously unbeaten combination of Eihort / Groth. User "alamogold" has done the same with "Shub-Niggurath / Tulzscha". An anonymous user has won over the "Shudde M'ell / The Dunwich Horror"<br /> combination. Despite all this efforts, the number of GOO/Heralds teams that have not been defeated keeps growing (notice that only combinations that have been played are listed here):<br /> <br /> GOO / Herald / Percentage of times the investigators were defeated.<br /> Abhoth	The King in Yellow	100.00%<br /> Cthulhu	Ghroth	100.00%<br /> Glaaki	Ghroth	100.00%<br /> Hastur	The Dunwich Horror	100.00%<br /> Hastur	Tulzscha	100.00%<br /> Nyarlathotep	The King in Yellow	100.00%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	Ghroth	100.00%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	The Dark Pharaoh	100.00%<br /> Tsathoggua	Ghroth	100.00%<br /> Tsathoggua	The King in Yellow	100.00%<br /> Tsathoggua	Tulzscha	100.00%<br /> Y'Golonac	Tulzscha	100.00%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	Tulzscha	100.00%<br /> Yog Sothoth	Tulzscha	100.00%<br /> Y'Golonac	The King in Yellow	 75.00%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	Ghroth	 66.67%<br /> Shudde M'ell	The King in Yellow	 66.67%<br /> Cthulhu	The Dark Pharaoh	 50.00%<br /> Cthulhu	The Dunwich Horror	 50.00%<br /> Cthulhu	The King in Yellow	 50.00%<br /> Eihort	Ghroth	 50.00%<br /> Eihort	Tulzscha	 50.00%<br /> Ithaqua	The Dark Pharaoh	 50.00%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	Tulzscha	 50.00%<br /> Shudde M'ell	The Dunwich Horror	 50.00%<br /> Yig	Tulzscha	 50.00%<br /> Yog Sothoth	The Dunwich Horror	 50.00%<br /> Hastur	The King in Yellow	 42.86%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	Tulzscha	 40.00%<br /> Azathoth	Ghroth	 40.00%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	Ghroth	 33.33%<br /> Nyarlathotep	The Dark Pharaoh	 16.67%<br /> <br /> <br /> About the Herald / guardian combinations and the impact in the number of investigators defeats, here you have the numbers:<br /> <br /> Type of game / number of sessions/ percentage of investigators defeat.<br /> Herald - Guardian	61	 50.82%<br /> Herald - No Guardian	31	 38.71%<br /> No Herald - Guardian	22	 31.82%<br /> No Herald - No Guardian	104	 42.31%<br /> <br /> Finally, the expansions usage. I am surprised about the big number of games using Kingsport Horror (I am still waiting for my copy!).<br /> <br /> Dunwich Horror	 54.59%<br /> Kingsport Horror	 48.62%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 39.91%<br /> The Yellow King	 49.08%<br /> <br /> That's all for the moment.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/169835.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/169835.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:52:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I would like to see a percentage of wins compared to the number of players. I am surprised no one has done this yet.<br /> <br /> -Rob]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/170174.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/170174.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:39:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Acebob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I noticed that one recorded session claimed a loss by Earthquake where Yig was the AO. Is this a mistake?<br /> <br /> I accidentally put in my name as Tib in one field instead of Tibs. Cursed laptop. If you don't fix that, no big deal. However:<br /> <br /> My (Tibs) most recent game was Hastur and the Dunwich Horror herald. I forgot to put a check box that the Dunwich Horror awoke. Could you change that please? This is only because I'm interested to see how the herald affects how often the Dunwich Horror awakens. Thanks!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/170559.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/170559.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:26:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tibs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ @Tibs,<br /> <br /> Yes, probably that is a mistake. I also have noticed some (2 or 3) sessions where the reported number of investigators is just "1" and the number of devoured investigators is very high (like 4 or something). Anyway, I think the number of correct games will be much bigger, so at the end the stats will not be too much affected by these errors, I hope.<br /> <br /> By the way, I have corrected the two things you mention from your games.<br /> <br /> @Acebob,<br /> <br /> Here it is the stat you were demanding.<br /> <br /> # of investigators / Percentage of investigator wins / number of investigator wins.<br /> 8	 33.33%	1<br /> 7	 50.00%	1<br /> 6	 53.33%	8<br /> 5	 68.42%	13<br /> 4	 63.22%	55<br /> 3	 55.32%	26<br /> 2	 42.50%	17<br /> 1	 60.00%	3<br /> <br /> I would ignore the results for 1 investigator as I think those are mistakes. However I would have bet different numbers for 4 and 5 investigators... I was expecting the "optimal" chances for 4 investigators, since 5 is already spawning two monsters per gate.<br /> <br /> If you (or any other forum user) have any other suggestion for stats, just let me know and I will see what can I do.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171240.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171240.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:34:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote] I would ignore the results for 1 investigator as I think those are mistakes.[/quote]<br /> <br /> Yup. The first two sessions I reported were mistakes. I meant to put 4 investigators used 1 devoured, but because I'm very smart I did it in reverse. <br /> <br /> Also: I have a feeling this would require a much more vast undertaking but I'd really be interested in a few drop downs that let you name the investigators you used. As the sample size grew, you could find out (loosely) not simply the successfulness of particular investigators, but, more interestingly, which investigators appear to work best with others. <br /> <br /> Thanks for all your work. This is interesting stuff.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171256.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171256.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:53:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ alamogold]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=alamogold][quote] I would ignore the results for 1 investigator as I think those are mistakes.[/quote]<br /> <br /> Yup. The first two sessions I reported were mistakes. I meant to put 4 investigators used 1 devoured, but because I'm very smart I did it in reverse. <br /> <br /> Also: I have a feeling this would require a much more vast undertaking but I'd really be interested in a few drop downs that let you name the investigators you used. As the sample size grew, you could find out (loosely) not simply the successfulness of particular investigators, but, more interestingly, which investigators appear to work best with others. <br /> <br /> Thanks for all your work. This is interesting stuff.[/quote]<br /> <br /> Ok, thanks for letting me know; I have corrected those two games now. I was wondering about them and, if they were true, it would be one hell of a game: just one investigator being devoured four times!<br /> <br /> Hmmm, about the investigators, maybe the best way to add them would be to have one "check box" for each existing investigator, so you can mark the ones that have been used. Is there an online list with all the existing investigator names? If so I will modify the form now. Otherwise it will have to wait until I arrive home and find some time...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171263.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171263.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:03:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Amanda Sharpe, the Student<br /> Vincent Lee, the Physician<br /> Daisy Walker, the Librarian<br /> Jacqueline Fine, the Psychic<br /> Michael McGlen, the Gangster<br /> Wendy Adams, the Urchin<br /> Kate Winthrop, the Scientist<br /> Marie Lambeau, the Entertainer<br /> Sister Mary, the Nun<br /> Harvey Walters, the Professor<br /> Rita Young, the Athlete<br /> Lola Young, the Actress<br /> Wilson Richards, the Handyman<br /> Charlie Kane, the Politician<br /> "Ashcan" Pete, the Drifter<br /> Mark Harrigan, the Soldier<br /> Darrell Simmons, the Photographer<br /> Gloria Goldberg, the Author<br /> Mandy Thompson, the Researcher<br /> Tony Morgan, the Bounty Hunter<br /> Lily Chen, the Martial Artist<br /> Rex Murphy, the Reporter<br /> Leo Anderson, the Expedition Leader<br /> Jenny Barnes, the Dilettante<br /> Dexter Drake, the Magician<br /> Monterey Jack, the Archaeologist<br /> Diane Stanley, the Redeemed Cultist<br /> Luke Robinson, the Dreamer<br /> Carolyn Fern, the Psychologist<br /> Joe Diamond, the Private Investigator<br /> Bob Jenkins, the Salesman<br /> Jim Culver, the Musician<br /> <br /> Whew. That's too many.<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171269.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171269.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:15:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ alamogold]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for providing the list!<br /> <br /> I have included them in the form. Let's see how this turns out. I must say that one of my favourite characters is Wilson Richards... but I have always an ugly luck with him.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171278.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171278.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:37:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ you could ask for houserules. For instance we always play our gates upside down and use all allies.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171305.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171305.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:25:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nardreg]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Well since one can add investigators now:<br /> <br /> <br /> My Cthulhu/Groth/Hypnos game had Joe Diamond and Marie Lambeau;<br /> <br /> The Eihort/Green Flame/Nodens game had Rex Murphy and Lily Chen;<br /> <br /> The Atlach-Nacha/Nemesis Moon/Hypnos game had Luke Robinson and Daisy Walker (and someone became Captain of the White Ship);<br /> <br /> The Y'Golonac/Green flame/Bast game had Wendy Adams and Lola Hayes;<br /> <br /> The Yibb-Tstll/Nemesis Moon/Nodens game had Tony Morgan and Charlie Kane.<br /> <br /> <br /> Don't remember any others. For ease of finding these games, The first one I listed was the most recent one I played, the others descending to the least recent one.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171630.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171630.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:40:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think I need a pinch of clarification.  When you say "# of Investigators devoured during the game", do you mean during the WHOLE game, including the Final Battle, or just intermittent devourings during Board Play before the Final Battle?<br /> <br /> If the game is lost during the Final Battle, does # of Investigators equal # of Devourings?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171712.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/171712.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:21:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jgt7771]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You should clarify that the "Defeat by Earthquake" does not refer to the final battle with Shudde M'ell.<br /> <br /> Here are some more spelling corrections:<br /> "The terror level rose to 10" instead of "rised." Perhaps even "reached 10."<br /> <br /> The redeemed cultist's name is Diana, not Diane]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/172216.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/172216.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:04:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tibs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ @Tibs,<br /> Thanks for your corrections, I have included them (lol at "rised" <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" />)<br /> <br /> @jgt7771<br /> I was referring to investigators devoured before the final battle. I have updated the form to clarify that.<br /> <br /> @Victimizer<br /> I have updated your entries with the information provided.<br /> <br /> @All,<br /> <br /> I will write during today the additional "logic" I need to process the data related to the investigators (also necessary for obtaining more information about the expansions usage).]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/172726.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/172726.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:01:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ All my comments so far have been criticisms and corrections. I need to take the time to say that what you are doing is awesome and I'm glad you're doing it. Thank you.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/173045.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/173045.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:06:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tibs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=MCFlainez]@jgt7771<br /> I was referring to investigators devoured before the final battle. I have updated the form to clarify that.[/quote]<br /> Then my latest entry should have "# of devourings" = 0.  All 4 Investigators made it to the Final Battle, but none of them went home.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/173236.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/173236.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:46:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jgt7771]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Thanks tibs, but don't worry: I also appreciate the criticisms and corrections, those are the things that can move this idea forward and enhance it.<br /> <br /> jgt7771, your session has been corrected now.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> By the way, as you can see in this [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/346917]picture[/url], I have finally received Kingsport Horror. It fits barely my table! I hope to play the first game this weekend...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/174126.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/174126.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:16:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=MCFlainez]By the way, as you can see in this [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/346917]picture[/url], I have finally received Kingsport Horror. It fits barely my table! I hope to play the first game this weekend...[/quote]<br /> <br /> Ah, so you were the guy who did the Dunwich non-Euclidean [url=http://boardgamegeek.com/image/169575]spiral[/url].]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/174423.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/174423.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:23:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tibs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Mcflainez, the entries to which the Investigators were supposed to be added (the ones I ntoed in my last post) do not seem to have been updated.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/176226.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/176226.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:35:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Victimizer]Mcflainez, the entries to which the Investigators were supposed to be added (the ones I ntoed in my last post) do not seem to have been updated.[/quote]<br /> <br /> Hi, I have checked and the entries are there. I don't know why they don't show up on the form page, but for sure they will be taken into account in the statistics.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/181749.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/181749.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 2 Jul 2008 09:31:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=tibs][quote=MCFlainez]By the way, as you can see in this [url=http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/346917]picture[/url], I have finally received Kingsport Horror. It fits barely my table! I hope to play the first game this weekend...[/quote]<br /> <br /> Ah, so you were the guy who did the Dunwich non-Euclidean [url=http://boardgamegeek.com/image/169575]spiral[/url].[/quote]<br /> <br /> Yes, the same one  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /> <br /> <br /> I hope that it will be the first picture in BGG to get 1000 thumbs up, but it will take a long time yet, we will see...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/181757.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/181757.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 2 Jul 2008 09:35:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ok, that's what counts.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/181760.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/181760.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 2 Jul 2008 09:37:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi everybody,<br /> <br /> Sorry for the lack of news, but at last I have to say that the promised web site is up. It is far from finished, <br /> but, at least, it is something.<br /> <br /> <a class="snap_shots" href="http://personales.ya.com/mcflainez/Arkham_Stats/Welcome.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://personales.ya.com/mcflainez/Arkham_Stats/Welcome.html</a><br /> <br /> I will publish new stats next Monday.<br /> <br /> Please, keep in mind that the URL will most surely change, so continue checking this thread to see if there are news.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/181782.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/181782.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 2 Jul 2008 09:43:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The site look fantastic! Great job!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/181863.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/181863.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 2 Jul 2008 10:31:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tiborvadovan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It's time for updated stats!<br /> <br /> Cthulhu, Nyarlathotep and Yig are the most popular GOOs, while Yibb-Tstll is the least preferred one.<br /> <br /> GOO / % of sessions<br /> Cthulhu	  9.54%<br /> Nyarlathotep	  9.54%<br /> Yig	  9.54%<br /> Azathoth	  8.83%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	  7.07%<br /> Hastur	  6.36%<br /> Shudde M'ell	  5.65%<br /> Yog Sothoth	  5.30%<br /> Y'Golonac	  5.30%<br /> Abhoth	  5.30%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	  4.95%<br /> Ithaqua	  4.95%<br /> Tsathoggua	  4.95%<br /> Glaaki	  4.59%<br /> Eihort	  4.24%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	  3.89%<br /> <br /> <br /> Y'Golonac is the most dangerous one, while Shub-Niggurath is the easiest for the investigators.<br /> <br /> GOO / % of investigator's defeat<br /> Y'Golonac	 66.67%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	 57.14%<br /> Shudde M'ell	 56.25%<br /> Glaaki	 53.85%<br /> Eihort	 50.00%<br /> Abhoth	 46.67%<br /> Tsathoggua	 42.86%<br /> Cthulhu	 40.74%<br /> Yog Sothoth	 40.00%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	 36.36%<br /> Hastur	 33.33%<br /> Azathoth	 32.00%<br /> Nyarlathotep	 29.63%<br /> Yig	 29.63%<br /> Ithaqua	 28.57%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	 25.00%<br /> <br /> <br /> 57.24% of the games didn't use an Herald. Among the heralds, this is the popularity chart:<br /> <br /> Herald / % of sessions (with herald) being used<br /> The King in Yellow	 26.45%<br /> Tulzscha	 26.45%<br /> Ghroth	 22.31%<br /> The Dunwich Horror	 13.22%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 11.57%<br /> <br /> <br /> The following combinations of GOOs / Heralds have not yet reported as defeated (and someone has tried):<br /> <br /> GOO / Herald<br /> Abhoth	The King in Yellow<br /> Cthulhu	Ghroth<br /> Eihort	The King in Yellow<br /> Glaaki	Ghroth<br /> Hastur	The Dunwich Horror<br /> Hastur	Tulzscha<br /> Shub-Niggurath	Ghroth<br /> Shub-Niggurath	The Dark Pharaoh<br /> Tsathoggua	Ghroth<br /> Tsathoggua	The King in Yellow<br /> Y'Golonac	Tulzscha<br /> <br /> 61.48% of the games didn't use a guardian. This is the guardian's popularity chart:<br /> <br /> Guardian / % of sessions (with guardian) being used<br /> Hypnos	 33.94%<br /> Nodens	 33.94%<br /> Bast	 32.11%<br /> <br /> Around 60% of the games end with investigator victory. The complete breakdown of results is:<br /> <br /> Game result / % of sessions<br /> Defeat (During Final Combat)	 37.10%<br /> Victory by seals	 26.50%<br /> Victory by Final Combat	 23.67%<br /> Victory by closing gates	  9.89%<br /> Defeat by Forfeit (Game not ended)	  1.06%<br /> Defeat by Act III (King in Yellow)	  0.71%<br /> Defeat by Earthquake (Shudde M'ell)	  0.71%<br /> Defeat by "Joining the Winning Team"	  0.35%<br /> <br /> Dunwich Horror is the most popular expansion:<br /> <br /> Expansions / % of sessions using it:<br /> Dunwich Horror	 56.54%<br /> Kingsport Horror	 47.70%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 39.58%<br /> The Yellow King	 49.47%<br /> <br /> <br /> 5 investigators seems to be the optimum number for achieving the victory:<br /> <br /> number of investigators / % of victories<br /> 8	 33.33%<br /> 7	 50.00%<br /> 6	 50.00%<br /> 5	 70.83%<br /> 4	 65.87%<br /> 3	 58.18%<br /> 2	 47.92%<br /> 1	 66.67%<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/187563.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/187563.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 7 Jul 2008 08:04:01]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi!<br /> <br /> Great work on the stats  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/b2eb59423fbf5fa39342041237025880.gif"  /> !<br /> <br /> Any chance of getting the number of sessions listed somewhere? As a running counter (increases as sessions are added)?<br /> <br /> Heck, even if you could post the # of session used to calculate the percentages each time you post an update, that'd be sweet  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/ed515dbff23a0ee3241dcc0a601c9ed6.gif" /> !]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/187937.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/187937.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:28:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Dam]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Dam]Hi!<br /> <br /> Great work on the stats  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/b2eb59423fbf5fa39342041237025880.gif"  /> !<br /> <br /> Any chance of getting the number of sessions listed somewhere? As a running counter (increases as sessions are added)?<br /> <br /> Heck, even if you could post the # of session used to calculate the percentages each time you post an update, that'd be sweet  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/ed515dbff23a0ee3241dcc0a601c9ed6.gif" /> ![/quote]<br /> <br /> You are right, I will do that.<br /> <br /> The stats above are calculated with an input of 283 sessions.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/187969.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/187969.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:54:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=MCFlainez]The stats above are calculated with an input of 283 sessions.[/quote]<br /> <br /> Cool  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/b2eb59423fbf5fa39342041237025880.gif"  /> !]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/187975.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/187975.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:56:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Dam]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=tibs]I noticed that you updated the form with "Walking the Ley Lines" as a victory condition, and not "Sacrifices to Make." [i]Sacrifices[/i] is in and of itself a unique victory condition, while [b]completing Ley Lines doesn't necessarily result in a victory[/b], and if it does it's technically a victory by "all gates closed."<br /> [/quote]<br /> <br /> Sorry to get slightly off topic here, but doesn't Walking the Ley Lines state that all open gates are closed? Since all open gates being closed is a victory condition, how does WtLL [i]not[/i] result in a victory?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/188638.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/188638.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 8 Jul 2008 01:23:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ petszk]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=petszk][quote=tibs]I noticed that you updated the form with "Walking the Ley Lines" as a victory condition, and not "Sacrifices to Make." [i]Sacrifices[/i] is in and of itself a unique victory condition, while [b]completing Ley Lines doesn't necessarily result in a victory[/b], and if it does it's technically a victory by "all gates closed."<br /> [/quote]<br /> <br /> Sorry to get slightly off topic here, but doesn't Walking the Ley Lines state that all open gates are closed? Since all open gates being closed is a victory condition, how does WtLL [i]not[/i] result in a victory?[/quote]<br /> <br /> If I am not wrong, to win by closing gates, you need to:<br /> <br /> 1) Have no open gates on the board.<br /> 2) Have a number of gate trophies equal or bigger than the number of investigators.<br /> <br /> Walking the Ley Lines fulfills condition 1, but does not guarantee condition 2.<br /> <br /> Please, anybody, correct me if I am wrong.<br /> <br /> Regards!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/188639.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/188639.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 8 Jul 2008 01:30:18]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ No, you're correct McFlainez. I drew WtLL the other day in a game with my friend, we discussed the feasability of it. WtLL requires the sacrifice of 1 gate trophy at 4 locations. Since we had 4 investigators, that would've meant having a total of 8 gate trophies during the game (4 for WtLL + 4 remaining when WtLL succeedes). We didn't go that route, seemed like a bit too tough a mission. Granted, if going for WtLL, you don't need to necessary seal gates. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/188699.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/188699.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:42:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Dam]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If I may, I think you should shorten the investigators to either their names [i]or[/i] their occupations. I find it quite a chore reading the list of investigators in other players' games.<br /> <br /> Oh, and you might consider including a drop-down for the League scenario used. I'm sure people may find themselves using them long after League play has expired.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/189078.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/189078.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:22:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tibs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=MCFlainez][quote=petszk][quote=tibs]I noticed that you updated the form with "Walking the Ley Lines" as a victory condition, and not "Sacrifices to Make." [i]Sacrifices[/i] is in and of itself a unique victory condition, while [b]completing Ley Lines doesn't necessarily result in a victory[/b], and if it does it's technically a victory by "all gates closed."<br /> [/quote]<br /> <br /> Sorry to get slightly off topic here, but doesn't Walking the Ley Lines state that all open gates are closed? Since all open gates being closed is a victory condition, how does WtLL [i]not[/i] result in a victory?[/quote]<br /> <br /> If I am not wrong, to win by closing gates, you need to:<br /> <br /> 1) Have no open gates on the board.<br /> 2) Have a number of gate trophies equal or bigger than the number of investigators.<br /> <br /> Walking the Ley Lines fulfills condition 1, but does not guarantee condition 2.<br /> <br /> Please, anybody, correct me if I am wrong.<br /> <br /> Regards![/quote]<br /> <br /> How embarrassing for me.  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/499fd50bc713bfcdf2ab5a23c00c2d62.gif" /><br /> I never actually knew about part 2 of the win by closing gates rule.<br /> I've just re-read the rules, and you're right - I don't know how I missed that on all my previous rule readings.<br /> <br />  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/499fd50bc713bfcdf2ab5a23c00c2d62.gif" /> <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/499fd50bc713bfcdf2ab5a23c00c2d62.gif" /> <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/499fd50bc713bfcdf2ab5a23c00c2d62.gif" />]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/189771.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/189771.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 8 Jul 2008 20:07:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ petszk]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote]How embarrassing for me.<br /> I never actually knew about part 2 of the win by closing gates rule.<br /> I've just re-read the rules, and you're right - I don't know how I missed that on all my previous rule readings. [/quote]<br /> <br /> Don't be embarrased for that... in my group, we were playing [i]for months[/i] (maybe even more than one year), with the "sneak" rule wrong; we didn't know that, while trying to evade a monster, in case you fail the roll, the monster inflicts you damage just as if you failed a combat check.  The difference in game's difficulty is big with that rule.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/190295.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/190295.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:07:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ MCFlainez, if you wouldn't mind a tiny bit of editing, looks like I made a fib in a recent session recording. Game vs Yog Sothoth (defeat during final combat) had [b]4[/b] investigators not 1 (5 listed at the end, and since 1 was devoured...). I think I might've forgotten to change the number from the default 1. <br /> <br /> When can we expect new percentages  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /> ?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/199858.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/199858.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:13:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Dam]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Dam]MCFlainez, if you wouldn't mind a tiny bit of editing, looks like I made a fib in a recent session recording. Game vs Yog Sothoth (defeat during final combat) had [b]4[/b] investigators not 1 (5 listed at the end, and since 1 was devoured...). I think I might've forgotten to change the number from the default 1. <br /> <br /> When can we expect new percentages  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /> ?[/quote]<br /> <br /> Hi, don't worry, I have already received some requests to correct data, so I will correct that aswell.<br /> <br /> About the new percentages, I will run the reports tomorrow morning (my time zone is GMT+1). Tomorrow or this Friday I would like to include new reports about investigator usage.<br /> <br /> Cheers!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/199870.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/199870.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:23:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi,<br /> <br /> Fresh stats, calculated using a sample of 337 sessions.<br /> <br /> This time the on-going AH League is having a big impact, since Yig and Nyarlathotep are the most popular GOOs right now. Yibb-Tstll and Eihort need more attention...<br /> <br /> GOO / % of sessions used<br /> Yig	 10.68%<br /> Nyarlathotep	 10.09%<br /> Cthulhu	  9.20%<br /> Azathoth	  8.31%<br /> Hastur	  6.53%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	  6.53%<br /> Shudde M'ell	  6.23%<br /> Y'Golonac	  5.64%<br /> Yog Sothoth	  5.34%<br /> Abhoth	  5.34%<br /> Ithaqua	  5.04%<br /> Glaaki	  4.45%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	  4.45%<br /> Tsathoggua	  4.45%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	  3.86%<br /> Eihort	  3.86%<br /> <br /> Y'Golonac is the thoughtest GOO, winning more than six times per ten games.<br /> <br /> GOO / % of investigator's defeat.<br /> Y'Golonac	 63.16%<br /> Glaaki	 60.00%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	 60.00%<br /> Shudde M'ell	 47.62%<br /> Eihort	 46.15%<br /> Abhoth	 44.44%<br /> Tsathoggua	 40.00%<br /> Yog Sothoth	 38.89%<br /> Cthulhu	 38.71%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	 38.46%<br /> Azathoth	 35.71%<br /> Hastur	 31.82%<br /> Ithaqua	 29.41%<br /> Yig	 27.78%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	 27.27%<br /> Nyarlathotep	 26.47%<br /> <br /> 40.65% of the games are using Heralds, Tulzscha being the most popular one:<br /> <br /> Tulzscha	 27.74%<br /> The King in Yellow	 27.01%<br /> Ghroth	 21.17%<br /> The Dunwich Horror	 13.14%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 10.95%<br /> <br /> There are 40 combinations reported of GOO / Heralds. From all this combinations, the most popular is Hastur with the King in Yellow, followed closely by Y'Golonac - Tulzscha and Nyarlathotep - The Dark Pharaoh.<br /> <br /> From all this combinations, these are the ones that at least someone has tried but that nobody has been able to defeat:<br /> <br /> Abhoth	The King in Yellow<br /> Atlach-Nacha	The Dunwich Horror<br /> Cthulhu	Ghroth<br /> Eihort	The King in Yellow<br /> Glaaki	Ghroth<br /> Hastur	The Dunwich Horror<br /> Hastur	Tulzscha<br /> Shub-Niggurath	Ghroth<br /> Shub-Niggurath	The Dark Pharaoh<br /> Tsathoggua	Ghroth<br /> Tsathoggua	The King in Yellow<br /> <br /> 36.80 % of the games used the help of some guardian. This is the breakdown:<br /> <br /> Nodens	 34.68%<br /> Hypnos	 33.06%<br /> Bast	 32.26%<br /> <br /> Less than 40% of the games end with investigator's defeat. Here is a detailed view of the results:<br /> <br /> Defeat (During Final Combat)	 36.01%<br /> Victory by seals	 27.38%<br /> Victory by Final Combat	 23.81%<br /> Victory by closing gates	  9.82%<br /> Defeat by Forfeit (Game not ended)	  1.19%<br /> Defeat by Earthquake (Shudde M'ell, not during Final Combat)	  0.89%<br /> Defeat by Act III (King in Yellow)	  0.60%<br /> Defeat by "Joining the Winning Team"	  0.30%<br /> <br /> But... but... Someone has reported a !!!Defeat by "Joining the Winning Team"!!!! That result was entered by Kormith. Hey, Kormith, is that true? Could you please give us some details about the game? I am asking because that is something I have never seen in all of my games. In fact, people don't even bother... probably that is the reason why I have not seen that. Anyway, congratulations for being the first one reporting that game result!<br /> <br /> Dunwich horror is the most common expansion:<br /> <br /> Dunwich Horror	 57.14%<br /> Kingsport Horror	 44.94%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 38.69%<br /> The Yellow King	 45.83%<br /> <br /> <br /> Now, 4 investigators seems to be the optimum number for achieving the victory:<br /> <br /> 8	 25.00%<br /> 7	 42.86%<br /> 6	 59.26%<br /> 5	 65.52%<br /> 4	 67.59%<br /> 3	 57.81%<br /> 2	 50.88%<br /> 1	 66.67%<br /> <br /> That's all for the moment.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/201078.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/201078.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:07:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Do you want stats added for the league games? It might skew things a bit. <br /> <br /> It would be cool to add a page for 'if you want the best chance of winning use these...' which you could split into sections such as monster, characters, items, tactics etc. I realise that is a lot of work though!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/201096.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/201096.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:16:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tamsyn]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I've just thought of something: It'd be interesting to know how the epic battle variant cards from Kingsport are helping the ancient ones; i.e. how their winning percentages are with and without these cards. It's probably much too late to ad though, so perhaps one could simply check what their percentages are in games using the Kingsport expansion.<br /> <br /> Better idea:<br /> Percentage of ancient one wins with base set, base set+single expansion and base+all expansions.<br /> <br /> <br /> Though really, the stats you offer now are interesting enough, this was just something I suddenly thought of. Thanks again for your work!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/201514.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/201514.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:25:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Victimizer]I've just thought of something: It'd be interesting to know how the epic battle variant cards from Kingsport are helping the ancient ones; i.e. how their winning percentages are with and without these cards. It's probably much too late to ad though, so perhaps one could simply check what their percentages are in games using the Kingsport expansion.<br /> <br /> Better idea:<br /> Percentage of ancient one wins with base set, base set+single expansion and base+all expansions.<br /> [/quote]<br /> The more stats the better as far as I am concerned.  A really great thread. My favorite.<br /> <br /> I use the undefeated GOOs and heralds combos as next game challenges.  Right now 0-2.<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/201530.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/201530.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:31:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mageith]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ As suggested by [b]Victimizer[/b], I have prepared some SQL to extract new data: percentages of victory / defeat based on the number of expansions used. (Defeat means Investigator's defeat).<br /> <br /> No Expansions	Victory	 70.59%<br /> No Expansions	Defeat	 29.41%<br /> <br /> 1 Expansion	Victory	 59.76%<br /> 1 Expansion	Defeat	 40.24%<br /> <br /> 2 Expansions	Victory	 68.06%<br /> 2 Expansions	Defeat	 31.94%<br /> <br /> 3 Expansions	Victory	 56.36%<br /> 3 Expansions	Defeat	 43.64%<br /> <br /> 4 Expansions	Victory	 47.46%<br /> 4 Expansions	Defeat	 52.54%<br /> <br /> The difference in difficulty between "no expansions" and "all expansions" is quite big!. I also have breakdowns of the different results depending on the number of expansions:<br /> <br /> No Expansions	Victory by seals	 32.35%<br /> No Expansions	Victory by Final Combat	 27.94%<br /> No Expansions	Defeat (During Final Combat)	 25.00%<br /> No Expansions	Victory by closing gates	 10.29%<br /> No Expansions	Defeat by Forfeit (Game not ended)	  4.41%<br /> <br /> <br /> 1 Expansion	Defeat (During Final Combat)	 39.02%<br /> 1 Expansion	Victory by Final Combat	 28.05%<br /> 1 Expansion	Victory by seals	 23.17%<br /> 1 Expansion	Victory by closing gates	  8.54%<br /> 1 Expansion	Defeat by Act III (King in Yellow)	  1.22%<br /> <br /> <br /> 2 Expansion	Victory by seals	 36.11%<br /> 2 Expansion	Defeat (During Final Combat)	 26.39%<br /> 2 Expansion	Victory by Final Combat	 19.44%<br /> 2 Expansion	Victory by closing gates	 12.50%<br /> 2 Expansion	Defeat by "Joining the Winning Team"	  1.39%<br /> 2 Expansion	Defeat by Act III (King in Yellow)	  1.39%<br /> 2 Expansion	Defeat by Earthquake (Shudde M'ell, not during Final Combat)	  1.39%<br /> 2 Expansion	Defeat by Forfeit (Game not ended)	  1.39%<br /> <br /> <br /> 3 Expansion	Defeat (During Final Combat)	 41.82%<br /> 3 Expansion	Victory by Final Combat	 27.27%<br /> 3 Expansion	Victory by seals	 23.64%<br /> 3 Expansion	Victory by closing gates	  5.45%<br /> 3 Expansion	Defeat by Earthquake (Shudde M'ell, not during Final Combat)	  1.82%<br /> <br /> <br /> 4 Expansion	Defeat (During Final Combat)	 50.85%<br /> 4 Expansion	Victory by seals	 20.34%<br /> 4 Expansion	Victory by Final Combat	 15.25%<br /> 4 Expansion	Victory by closing gates	 11.86%<br /> 4 Expansion	Defeat by Earthquake (Shudde M'ell, not during Final Combat)	  1.69%<br /> <br /> <br /> Thanks for your suggestions, victimizer!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/202584.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/202584.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:38:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Naw, Thank you for this!<br /> <br /> Also: Perhaps the use of epic battle cards could be a choice on the form itself - some people might be using them separate from kingsport, or not at all with Kingsport, and with data on a few games using these, a comparison could be made between the difference in percentage of investigator wins/defeats during final combat with and without the epic battle variant.<br /> <br /> *edit*<br /> <br /> Also, now that you have a site, I think this thread deserves a sticky. Who would also proclaim this opinion?<br /> <br /> Oh and, McFlainez, you could also add your sites' url to the first post, that'd make it easier for new-comers.<br /> <br /> *edit*<br /> And I've noticed that on your website, one cannot look at all of the games played. I'm not sure if it is possible to embed the chart a second time so that it displays all of the games the way the google chart in the first post of this thread does, but that would be useful for some people, or at least a link to the entire thing from your website. Not too important minor quibble, but could be useful at some point, also for people that try to interprete the data in other ways than the numerical.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/202681.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/202681.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:08:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Thanks, MCFlainez!  You are the business.  However:<br /> <br /> [quote=MCFlainez]<br /> 2 Expansion	Defeat by "Joining the Winning Team"	  1.39%<br /> [/quote]<br /> <br /> This person is arguably more awesome even than you.  Has there been a match report?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/202858.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/202858.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:14:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mr Mauve]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <br /> I like the statistics a lot. I just entered the game I did yesterday and I will soon post another few. I've got an Access file with the last games I made at home, mainly because I want to defeat every AO with every combination of Herald and Guardian possible (which are 240 combinations as of now; and I won't count Victories in Final Battle). I'll make sure to record defeats as well from now on, so your statistics are not distorted by only reporting victories.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/202935.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/202935.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:17:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Morgaln]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Victimizer]Also, now that you have a site, I think this thread deserves a sticky. Who would also proclaim this opinion?[/quote]<br /> Too many stickys now.<br /> Is there a way to folderize the stickies into a sticky folder called, [b]Look here first [/b] or [b]All Our stickies [/b]and that comes up as changed?  If that is the case, I vote for this being a sticky in that folder.  It's really my favorite thread (after Kevin's rules, of course).<br /> <br /> I'd also like to see strange eons in a sticky file with all its categories.  I'd also like to see a new category in that called [b]custom heralds [/b]and change the tile of custom GOO's and heralds to just [b]Custom GOO's[/b]<br /> <br /> I don't know if that can be done or not, just a suggestion.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/203016.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/203016.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:13:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mageith]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I agree, a subforum for stickies would really be best.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/203031.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/203031.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:25:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Sorry, [i]Victory by "Sacrifices to Make"[/i] is supposed to be [i]Victory by "For the Greater Good"[/i]. My bad!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/214215.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/214215.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:58:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tibs]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hello guys,<br /> <br /> First of all sorry for not posting anything these last days, but I was first on vacation and then busy at work. I have been doing some improvements to this "arkham stats" thing, but it is all related to the database and the workflow I follow to extract the data, so it makes my life easier, although you will not notice anything different or new.<br /> <br /> Said this, let's go with the updated stats based on 429 games (almost 100 sessions over the last time).<br /> <br /> MOST POPULAR GOO: Not big changes on the top of the list, Nyarlathotep and Yig are the most popular followed closely by Cthulhu. Atlach-Nacha and Glaaki are losing popularity and now they are on the bottom along with the never-popular Eihort<br /> <br /> GOO / % of sessions<br /> Nyarlathotep	 11.16%<br /> Yig	 11.16%<br /> Cthulhu	  9.07%<br /> Azathoth	  7.44%<br /> Hastur	  6.51%<br /> Yog Sothoth	  6.05%<br /> Shudde M'ell	  6.05%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	  5.81%<br /> Ithaqua	  5.58%<br /> Tsathoggua	  5.58%<br /> Y'Golonac	  5.58%<br /> Abhoth	  4.88%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	  3.95%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	  3.72%<br /> Eihort	  3.72%<br /> Glaaki	  3.72%<br /> <br /> <br /> MOST DANGEROUS GOO: Glaaki is now on the lead (was second before). The previous champion has dropped to the 4th place (Y'Golonac). On the bottom of the list Shub-Niggurath has recovered a bit, Yig has dropped a place and poor Nyarlathotep has lost a big chunk of percentage in victories (from 26.47% to 18.75%).<br /> <br /> GOO / % of investigator's defeat.<br /> Glaaki	 62.50%<br /> Tsathoggua	 58.33%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	 56.25%<br /> Y'Golonac	 54.17%<br /> Shudde M'ell	 53.85%<br /> Abhoth	 52.38%<br /> Yog Sothoth	 38.46%<br /> Eihort	 37.50%<br /> Cthulhu	 35.90%<br /> Azathoth	 34.38%<br /> Hastur	 32.14%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	 29.41%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	 28.00%<br /> Ithaqua	 25.00%<br /> Yig	 25.00%<br /> Nyarlathotep	 18.75%<br /> <br /> MOST POPULAR HERALDS: Less games are being played with heralds; from 40.65% to 36.28%. The popularity of the Heralds is exactly the same with small changes in the percentages:<br /> <br /> Tulzscha	 26.92%<br /> The King in Yellow	 25.64%<br /> Ghroth	 22.44%<br /> The Dunwich Horror	 14.74%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 10.26%<br /> <br /> UNBEATEN COMBINATIONS: There are 42 combinations of GOO/Herald (2 more than the last time). The most popular one is still Hastur with The King in Yellow, followed very closely by Nyarlathotep - The Dark Pharaoh.<br /> <br /> From all this combinations, these are the ones that at least someone has tried but that nobody has been able to defeat: <br /> <br /> Abhoth	The King in Yellow	100.00%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	The Dunwich Horror	100.00%<br /> Eihort	The King in Yellow	100.00%<br /> Glaaki	Ghroth	100.00%<br /> Hastur	The Dunwich Horror	100.00%<br /> Hastur	Tulzscha	100.00%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	Ghroth	100.00%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	The Dark Pharaoh	100.00%<br /> Tsathoggua	Ghroth	100.00%<br /> Tsathoggua	The King in Yellow	100.00%<br /> <br /> From the previous list of unbeaten combinations, only one (Cthulhu - Ghroth) has been successfully confronted as reported by Morgaln. With a team composed by Carolyn Fern, Kate Winthrop, Michael McGlen and Tony Morgan he achieved a victory by seals. Congratulations, Morgaln!!!<br /> <br /> MOST POPULAR GUARDIANS: Just like the heralds, there is a small drop in guardians usage, from 36.8% to 34.19%. Hypnos and Nodens have switched positions on this list, but things are really balanced.<br /> <br /> Hypnos	 34.69%<br /> Nodens	 34.01%<br /> Bast	 31.29%<br /> <br /> GAME RESULTS: Small changes in the percentages, but nothing really important here.<br /> <br /> Defeat (During Final Combat)	 34.03%<br /> Victory by seals	 30.54%<br /> Victory by Final Combat	 21.91%<br /> Victory by closing gates	 10.49%<br /> Defeat by Forfeit (Game not ended)	  1.63%<br /> Defeat by Earthquake (Shudde M'ell, not during Final Combat)	  0.70%<br /> Defeat by Act III (King in Yellow)	  0.47%<br /> Defeat by "Joining the Winning Team"	  0.23%<br /> <br /> EXPANSIONS: Also, no big news here, the percentages are more or less the same:<br /> <br /> Dunwich Horror	 58.04%<br /> Kingsport Horror	 41.49%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 39.39%<br /> The Yellow King	 41.72%<br /> <br /> NUMBER OF INVESTIGATORS/VICTORY: "4 investigators" is the magic number, it seems. Its percentage is getting better and better and is leaving behind the "5 investigator".<br /> <br /> 8	 25.00%<br /> 7	 55.56%<br /> 6	 58.62%<br /> 5	 66.67%<br /> 4	 70.37%<br /> 3	 59.76%<br /> 2	 50.00%<br /> 1	 66.67%<br /> <br /> NUMBER OF EXPANSIONS / VICTORY: Playing with no expansions seems easy as cake. There is a boost of 6% since the last time in victories.<br /> <br /> No Expansions	Victory	 76.29%<br /> No Expansions	Defeat	 23.71%<br /> <br /> With one expansion, things seem not so easy. There is a 4% drop in victories this time.<br /> <br /> 1 Expansion	Victory	 55.66%<br /> 1 Expansion	Defeat	 44.34%<br /> <br /> Surprisingly, when adding more expansions, the percentage of victories has increased:<br /> <br /> 2 Expansions	Victory	 69.32%<br /> 2 Expansions	Defeat	 30.68%<br /> <br /> 3 Expansions	Victory	 59.32%<br /> 3 Expansions	Defeat	 40.68%<br /> <br /> Using all 4 expansions is the hardest option. Can't wait for the Black Goat of the woods!<br /> <br /> 4 Expansions	Victory	 51.90%<br /> 4 Expansions	Defeat	 48.10%<br /> <br /> That is all for the moment. I *hope* to bring some new things in the coming days. Sorry, but I can't promise anything about when...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/220795.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/220795.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:08:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It's a very, very interesting analysis.<br /> It would also be nice to know how many people (or games) were involved for each record.<br /> <br /> It's easy to say, e.g.,  "100% defeats with Hastur+Tulzscha" if the combo has been tested just once.<br /> <br /> I'll be glad ti contribute if I just remember to write down the data after my next games... <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" />]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/220855.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/220855.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:58:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ 357magnum]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=MCFlainez]<br /> UNBEATEN COMBINATIONS: There are 42 combinations of GOO/Herald (2 more than the last time). The most popular one is still Hastur with The King in Yellow, followed very closely by Nyarlathotep - The Dark Pharaoh.<br /> [/quote]<br /> Why aren't there 80 combos?  16 AO times 5 Heralds?<br /> <br /> Or are you saying 42 have been played?  That means 38 are unbeaten (but apparently most of those haven't even been tried.)  If that is the case, I'd like to see the whole list of unbeaten combos to increase the challenge.<br /> <br /> And if you play more than one herald, I think 1920 combos.<br /> <br /> Keep up the good work.  I always enjoy your work and report.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/221342.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/221342.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:31:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mageith]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Sorry to make a request for an already great system, but would it be possible to list victory% for individual investigators? I ask because of the nerfing discussions and out of general curiosity.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/221360.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/221360.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:47:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Nijay]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I've sent in some reports, I'm looking forward to the next update! Also, those unbeaten combinations need some attention. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/232082.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/232082.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:41:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tamsyn]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=MCFlainez]MOST DANGEROUS GOO: Glaaki is now on the lead (was second before). The previous champion has dropped to the 4th place (Y'Golonac). On the bottom of the list Shub-Niggurath has recovered a bit, Yig has dropped a place and poor Nyarlathotep has lost a big chunk of percentage in victories (from 26.47% to 18.75%).<br /> <br /> GOO / % of investigator's defeat.<br /> Glaaki	 62.50%<br /> Tsathoggua	 58.33%<br /> Atlach-Nacha	 56.25%<br /> Y'Golonac	 54.17%<br /> Shudde M'ell	 53.85%<br /> Abhoth	 52.38%<br /> Yog Sothoth	 38.46%<br /> Eihort	 37.50%<br /> Cthulhu	 35.90%<br /> Azathoth	 34.38%<br /> Hastur	 32.14%<br /> Yibb-Tstll	 29.41%<br /> Shub-Niggurath	 28.00%<br /> Ithaqua	 25.00%<br /> Yig	 25.00%<br /> Nyarlathotep	 18.75%[/quote]<br /> <br /> Wow! This was the first time I read this thread, and I'm quite surprised that Glakki is the most dangerous GOO. I would've predicted he'd be more in the middle, as I've never had that many problems with him, so this really surprised me. Great job with the stats!!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/247411.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/247411.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:49:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kaz Necro]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Kaz Necro]Wow! This was the first time I read this thread, and I'm quite surprised that Glakki is the most dangerous GOO. I would've predicted he'd be more in the middle, as I've never had that many problems with him, so this really surprised me. Great job with the stats!![/quote]<br /> <br /> Note that there isn't many games against Glaaki, so it isn't yet very trustworthy conclusion.<br /> <br /> Apparently there is only 16 games against Glaaki recorded at the time of last update so there is very big random factor involved in statistics right now.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/247565.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/247565.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:37:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Vemb]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ For me Glaaki seriously is the #1 worst GOO. Always seems that "discard 2 Clue Tokens" Servant shows up at the wrong time  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/2e207fad049d4d292f60607f80f05768.gif" /> . Similarly, always keep getting weird Mythos Card combos against him. 3 tries, yet to seal/close him  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/9d71f0541cff0a302a0309c5079e8dee.gif" /> .<br /> <br /> As for the flipside, I'm guessing Tsathoggua's difficulty is somewhat due to the league scenario, since my games against it have always been a breeze (not participating in the league). Shudde M'ell is another that I've yet to lose against, only once has he even woken (again, 3 tries, 1 even with a Herald).<br /> <br /> <br /> Also, MCFlainez, I think the bump of this thread is a subtle hint that people NEED more stats, soon  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /> ! (no rush I'm sure, silly real-life can make you [b]delayed[/b]  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /> )]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/247814.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/247814.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:58:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Dam]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi there!<br /> <br /> First of all, I want to apologize for the lack of new stats during this last weeks... as Dam has said, I have been "delayed" by some other important things.<br /> <br /> Second, I would like to say "thank you" to all the people that has been posting their game sessions in the form, even when there were no news from me... Thanks!<br /> <br /> Finally, I want to post here again the url you can use to submit your game results and, that way, contribute to these stats: <br /> <br /> <a class="snap_shots" href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?key=pYsj88WqxwxBt5mRULVwXbw" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?key=pYsj88WqxwxBt5mRULVwXbw</a><br /> <br /> And now, the stats (resulting from 533):<br /> <br /> [b]Most popular GOO![/b]<br /> <br /> Not big changes here. The only thing worth metioning is that Glaaki has experimented a boost in popularity.<br /> <br /> =	Nyarlathotep	 11.07%<br /> =	Yig	 10.51%<br /> =	Cthulhu	  8.82%<br /> +	Hastur	  7.50%<br /> -	Azathoth	  7.32%<br /> +	Shudde M'ell	  6.19%<br /> -	Yog Sothoth	  6.00%<br /> +	Ithaqua	  6.00%<br /> -	Shub-Niggurath	  5.82%<br /> =	Tsathoggua	  5.82%<br /> =	Y'Golonac	  5.07%<br /> ++++	Glaaki	  4.32%<br /> -	Abhoth	  4.32%<br /> =	Atlach-Nacha	  3.94%<br /> --	Yibb-Tstll	  3.75%<br /> -	Eihort	  3.56%<br /> <br /> [b]Most dangerous GOO![/b]<br /> <br /> There is quite a bit of movement here. Atlach-Nacha is now dominating the list, Cthulhu and Yibb-Tstll have improved and Tsathoggua is the one that has lost more places.<br /> <br /> ++	Atlach-Nacha	 61.90%<br /> -	Glaaki	 60.87%<br /> +	Y'Golonac	 55.56%<br /> +	Shudde M'ell	 48.48%<br /> ---	Tsathoggua	 48.39%<br /> =	Abhoth	 43.48%<br /> ++	Cthulhu	 42.55%<br /> -	Yog Sothoth	 37.50%<br /> -	Eihort	 36.84%<br /> ++	Yibb-Tstll	 35.00%<br /> -	Azathoth	 33.33%<br /> -	Hastur	 32.50%<br /> =	Shub-Niggurath	 29.03%<br /> =	Ithaqua	 28.13%<br /> =	Yig	 25.00%<br /> =	Nyarlathotep	 20.34%<br /> <br /> [b]Most popular Heralds![/b]<br /> <br /> There is a small boost in Heralds usage, not it is at 38.46% of the sessions... and the king in yellow is again the most popular.<br /> <br /> +	The King in Yellow	 25.37%<br /> -	Tulzscha	 23.41%<br /> +	The Dunwich Horror	 19.51%<br /> -	Ghroth	 18.54%<br /> =	The Dark Pharaoh	 13.17%<br /> <br /> [b]Unbeaten Combos![/b]<br /> <br /> Ok, there were some comments about how this stat is created. Yes, I am using only the combinations that somebody has tried and reported in the form. That means that there are combinations that nobody has tried yet. Also, it means that some of the unbeaten combinations only have been confronted once. Knowing this, I still think this is a fun stat; what do you think about it?<br /> <br /> One thing that can be done is to create a list of every goo / herald / guardian combination and keep a track of which ones have been defeated. I will look into this, but right now I don't have the time for it, sorry.<br /> <br /> The stat itself: There are 53 combinations reported, 9 more than the last time. Now, there are 14 unbeaten combinations:<br /> <br /> 	Abhoth	The King in Yellow<br /> 	Atlach-Nacha	The Dunwich Horror<br /> New!	Atlach-Nacha	The King in Yellow<br /> 	Glaaki	Ghroth<br /> New!	Hastur	Ghroth<br /> New!	Hastur	The Dark Pharaoh<br /> 	Hastur	The Dunwich Horror<br /> 	Shub-Niggurath	Ghroth<br /> 	Shub-Niggurath	The Dark Pharaoh<br /> 	Tsathoggua	Ghroth<br /> 	Tsathoggua	The King in Yellow<br /> New!	Y'Golonac	The Dunwich Horror<br /> New!	Yig	The King in Yellow<br /> New!	Yog Sothoth	Ghroth<br /> <br /> From the previous unbeaten combinations 2 have been defeated:<br /> <br /> Eihort with The King in Yellow by [b]johnwatersfan[/b] (first reported) and [b]Tibs[/b].<br /> Hastur with Tulzscha by [b]Superchemist[/b] (first reported) and... [b]Tibs[/b] again!<br /> <br /> [b]Guardians popularity![/b]<br /> <br /> A small boost in their popularity: 34.61% but no changes in the list.<br /> <br /> =	Hypnos	 36.22%<br /> =	Nodens	 34.59%<br /> =	Bast	 29.19%<br /> <br /> <br /> [b]Game results![/b]<br /> <br /> No big news here, I think:<br /> <br /> Defeat (During Final Combat)	 34.90%<br /> Victory by seals	 30.96%<br /> Victory by Final Combat	 21.58%<br /> Victory by closing gates	 10.13%<br /> Defeat by Forfeit (Game not ended)	  1.31%<br /> Defeat by Earthquake (Shudde M'ell, not during Final Combat)	  0.56%<br /> Defeat by Act III (King in Yellow)	  0.38%<br /> Defeat by "Joining the Winning Team"	  0.19%<br /> <br /> [b]Expansions usage![/b]<br /> <br /> A small boost for Dunwich Horror and The Dark Pharaoh.<br /> <br /> Dunwich Horror	 61.16%<br /> Kingsport Horror	 41.09%<br /> The Dark Pharaoh	 42.78%<br /> The Yellow King	 40.53%<br /> <br /> [b]Victories depending on the number of investigators![/b]<br /> <br /> Small variations in the percentages.<br /> <br /> 8	 25.00%<br /> 7	 55.56%<br /> 6	 59.38%<br /> 5	 67.39%<br /> 4	 69.26%<br /> 3	 57.69%<br /> 2	 51.11%<br /> 1	 75.00%<br /> <br /> [b]Victories depending on the number of expansions in play![/b]<br /> <br /> No Expansions	Victory	 72.81%<br /> No Expansions	Defeat	 27.19%<br /> <br /> 1 Expansion	Victory	 60.29% (Big increase here)<br /> 1 Expansion	Defeat	 39.71%<br /> <br /> 2 Expansions	Victory	 70.00%<br /> 2 Expansions	Defeat	 30.00%<br /> <br /> 3 Expansions	Victory	 59.32%<br /> 3 Expansions	Defeat	 40.68%<br /> <br /> 4 Expansions	Defeat	 50.00%<br /> 4 Expansions	Victory	 50.00%<br /> <br /> <br /> That's all for the moment! I hope to be able to keep a regular flow of stats during the next days.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259172.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259172.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:33:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I have been eagerly awaiting these (especially used expansion stats)...thanks Mcflainez! After the results for scenario 3 are up I'm going to boost Tsathogguas percentage with the number of games played - and lost - against that guy by my team *cries*.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259182.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259182.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:56:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ great work. when i'm not playing a league game I send in my stats, and I will be trying those unbeaten combos!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259293.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259293.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:00:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ tamsyn]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Oh yeah, I wanted to add that I think listing unbeaten combos is a good idea - at the very least, they can potentially shed light on which combinations are more difficult than others (even in only a small way, given the amount of data).]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259303.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259303.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:08:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=MCFlainez]Unbeaten Combos! [/quote]<br /> <br /> I think Atlach-Nacha + BGotW Herald might dominate that list in the near future. You can set the clock: You got 12 turns + each elder sign + each broken seal... (not counting south church encounters or Marie Lambeau or things i dunno about yet <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /> ) ...then game over.<br /> <br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259799.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259799.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:14:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sirprim]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Actually, I've broken that particular combo the other day in a three player game with all expansions (we beat Atlach-Nacha in mortal combat). I haven't reported it yet though - I'm gonna do that once the results are in. we had a ridiculous amount of allies thanks to the Kingsport wanderings of Rex Murphy, and Daisy was also part of the team (Arcane Insight shenanigans).]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259893.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/259893.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:26:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Victimizer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ok, guys, something [b]new[/b]! We know about goos, heralds, guardians and expansions popularity, but now it is time for...<br /> <br /> [b]Investigators Popularity![/b]<br /> <br /> And Mandy Thompson is truly dominating this list. Taking into account my preferences about the investigators, I am a bit surprised about some of the numbers: Mark Harrigan is well ranked, but Leo Anderson is doing pretty poorly as an example... And what is going on with Lily Chen? I know she is good character (and good looking also <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /> ) but she is from the last expansion yet she is at a 4th place!<br /> <br /> Investigator	Sessions<br /> Mandy Thompson	71<br /> Darrell Simmons	52<br /> Dexter Drake	51<br /> Lily Chen	47<br /> Carolyn Fern	45<br /> Ashcan Pete	44<br /> Joe Diamond	42<br /> Mark Harrigan	42<br /> Jacqueline Fine	41<br /> Michael McGlen	40<br /> Harvey Walters	39<br /> Gloria Goldberg	38<br /> Kate Winthrop	38<br /> Jenny Barnes	37<br /> Diana Stanley	36<br /> Vicent Lee	35<br /> Wilson Richards	35<br /> Daisy Walker	34<br /> Bob Jenkins	33<br /> Tony Morgan	32<br /> Monterey_Jack	31<br /> Lola Young	30<br /> Rita Young	30<br /> Sister Mary	29<br /> Amanda Sharpe	28<br /> Luke Robinson	28<br /> Rex Murphy	27<br /> Leo Anderson	26<br /> Jim Culver	25<br /> Charlie Kane	22<br /> Marie Lambeau	22<br /> Wendy Adams	22<br /> <br /> Expect to see an analysis between investigators an victories soon (but not today <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" /> )<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/260445.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/260445.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Sep 2008 04:41:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MCFlainez]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=MCFlainez]Ok, guys, something [b]new[/b]! We know about goos, heralds, guardians and expansions popularity, but now it is time for...<br /> <br /> [b]Investigators Popularity![/b]<br /> <br /> And Mandy Thompson is truly dominating this list. Taking into account my preferences about the investigators, I am a bit surprised about some of the numbers: Mark Harrigan is well ranked, but Leo Anderson is doing pretty poorly as an example... And what is going on with Lily Chen? I know she is good character (and good looking also <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /> ) but she is from the last expansion yet she is at a 4th place!<br /> <br /> Investigator	Sessions<br /> Mandy Thompson	71<br /> Darrell Simmons	52<br /> Dexter Drake	51<br /> [/quote]<br /> <br /> Go Dexter! Go!<br /> <br /> Now that was a surprise to me.<br /> <br /> -Mariana the ex-nun cultist]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/260450.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/260450.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 5 Sep 2008 04:53:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cw67q]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I object!!! (and vigorously at that)<br /> <br /> Having just completed Join the Winning Team, I object to it being classified as a "defeat". I mean, come on, read the effing card "You [b]WIN[/b] the game"  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /> . Okay, so the others lose, but a win's a win, no  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /> ? Oh, I agree thematically it's weird as hell, especially since I did against Azathoth, but from a gameplay POV, and given its difficulty, it's definately up there in the challenge it presents. If 3 of 4 investigators get killed in the Final Combat but the GOO is defeated, I'm sure the survivor will posthumously honor the fallen <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/b2eb59423fbf5fa39342041237025880.gif"  /> . Why should it be any different here?<br /> <br /> Lowdown on how it all went down:<br /> <br /> Solo game, random chars (as always), drew Leo Anderson as the first one (4 investigators), started with Zebulon Whateley AND a Task that had an Ally as one of the reward. Granted, wasn't thinking about JtWT at this point. But the pre-game Mythos card had dropped a 2nd Clue Token on STL and Leo went to grab the tokens, also getting Ruby Standish while at it. Now I was thinking maybe. Would you know it, Bob Jenkins was next, shopping at the Curiositie Shoppe, drew 2 weapons and JtWT. Though about it for a bit, then said what the hell, I'll go for it. Next turn, Kate Winthrop went shopping drew Holy Water, something and Dhol Chants. As they said in South Park just yesterday: "It's ON!" By turn 6, Leo had 4 allies and JtWT. Yes, I had all four investigators working as a team to get Leo to JtWT! First 3 drop-offs went without a hitch, but seemed like the fates were trying to prevent it, as Leo had gotten Blessed by an encounter at the Science Building and failing rolls in the OW gets you LiTaS'd. Anyway, Leo dove into the Abyss, 1st encounter was beneficial only. 2nd one however was monster appears. I'd shifted Leo's Will to max (to prevent insanity and the chance of getting the Ally remover Madness) and that only left him with 1 Fight and no Weapons. Monster turned out to be Color Out of Space, which luckily in this case, will beat you up if your fight is at 1!<br /> <br /> <br /> I'm so totally counting the game as a win  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /> !]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/280901.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/280901.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:09:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Dam]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Dam]I object!!! (and vigorously at that)<br /> <br /> Having just completed Join the Winning Team, I object to it being classified as a "defeat". I mean, come on, read the effing card "You [b]WIN[/b] the game"  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" /> . Okay, so the others lose, but a win's a win, no  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /> ? Oh, I agree thematically it's weird as hell, especially since I did against Azathoth, but from a gameplay POV, and given its difficulty, it's definately up there in the challenge it presents. If 3 of 4 investigators get killed in the Final Combat but the GOO is defeated, I'm sure the survivor will posthumously honor the fallen <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/b2eb59423fbf5fa39342041237025880.gif"  /> . Why should it be any different here?<br /> <br /> Lowdown on how it all went down:<br /> <br /> Solo game, random chars (as always), drew Leo Anderson as the first one (4 investigators), started with Zebulon Whateley AND a Task that had an Ally as one of the reward. Granted, wasn't thinking about JtWT at this point. But the pre-game Mythos card had dropped a 2nd Clue Token on STL and Leo went to grab the tokens, also getting Ruby Standish while at it. Now I was thinking maybe. Would you know it, Bob Jenkins was next, shopping at the Curiositie Shoppe, drew 2 weapons and JtWT. Though about it for a bit, then said what the hell, I'll go for it. Next turn, Kate Winthrop went shopping drew Holy Water, something and Dhol Chants. As they said in South Park just yesterday: "It's ON!" By turn 6, Leo had 4 allies and JtWT. Yes, I had all four investigators working as a team to get Leo to JtWT! First 3 drop-offs went without a hitch, but seemed like the fates were trying to prevent it, as Leo had gotten Blessed by an encounter at the Science Building and failing rolls in the OW gets you LiTaS'd. Anyway, Leo dove into the Abyss, 1st encounter was beneficial only. 2nd one however was monster appears. I'd shifted Leo's Will to max (to prevent insanity and the chance of getting the Ally remover Madness) and that only left him with 1 Fight and no Weapons. Monster turned out to be Color Out of Space, which luckily in this case, will beat you up if your fight is at 1!<br /> <br /> <br /> I'm so totally counting the game as a win  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" /> ![/quote]<br /> <br /> <br /> Now that is weird. All four investigators joining forces to complete "Joining the Winning Team" so that Azathoth can arrive before er,... before Azathoth arrives. Like all the kids in town working together to make xmas come sooner <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" /><br /> <br /> They could have saved themselves a lot of stress and work by just all hanging out in Hibbs, boozing playing the odd round of cards or pool and putting theri feet up until DT 14 hit the fan.<br /> <br /> Funny story - Mariana the ex-nun cultsit]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/280924.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/280924.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:50:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cw67q]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm going to take the challenge tonight and try to solo this combination with 10 pack of cider... =)<br /> <br /> [quote]Tsathoggua The King in Yellow[/quote]<br /> <br /> I'll report it tomorrow how it went... combination will be 4 investigators, DH, KiY, CotDP, selecting investigators from randomly drawn 3. (Total 12 will be drawn and 4 will be selected).<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/280949.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/280949.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:35:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Cariosus]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote=Cariosus]I'm going to take the challenge tonight and try to solo this combination with 10 pack of cider... =)<br /> <br /> [quote]Tsathoggua The King in Yellow[/quote]<br /> <br /> I'll report it tomorrow how it went... combination will be 4 investigators, DH, KiY, CotDP, selecting investigators from randomly drawn 3. (Total 12 will be drawn and 4 will be selected).<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [/quote]<br /> <br /> selecting 1 from each sequential set of three? or 4 from a total of 12?<br /> <br /> Only the first strikes me as really being 1 from 3. The second is 1 from12, then 1 from 11, etc and actually gives a much borader choice.<br /> <br />  <img src="http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums//images/smilies/2786c5c8e1a8be796fb2f726cca5a0fe.gif" /> I just realised how much these message boards bring out my inner geek.<br /> <br /> - Mariana the ex-nun cultist<br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/281005.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffgforums/posts/preList/7723/281005.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:06:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cw67q]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Arkham Horror Statistics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ [quote]Post Fri, 2008 Sep 26, 9:06 AM (CDT)     Subject: Re:Arkham Horr