Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...
You are here: FFG Forums /  Board and Card Games /  Mag Blast

Mag Blast
The time for talk has passed - and Mag Blasts speak louder than words!
Moderator: ffgjafferGeckoThe Spaniard Topics: 18 | Posts: 45
2nd ed vs. 3rd ed
Published on 07 December 2008 - 07:51:26

So which is better in your opinion? The 2nd edition or the 3rd?

The big differences are probably the TI theme on the 2nd and the toonish theme on the 3rd, some revised alien powers on the 3rd. All ships from the same class have similar specs on the 3rd, some new cards on the 3rd and omission of the ship upgrades from the 2nd, and of course the minesweeper and asteroid fields on the 3rd. So which one is better?

Kalisti

Page 1 of 1 (10 messages) 1
Reply #1 | Published on 09 December 2008 - 17:03:40

I have the 2nd ed and as a TI3 player I love the Twilight theme and do not want to switch to the 3rd edition.

Variant TI3 Files any can download on Mediafire:
tiny.cc/KqtGn

Reply #2 | Published on 28 January 2009 - 15:15:30

Well, I'm committing a cardinal sin of Forum posting and ressurrecting an old post.

BUT, when the third edition was announced, it made me realize I had lost a few cards from my first edition and I could only do one thing.  Buy the second edition before third came out and made second harder to find.

I LOVE the artwork of 1E and 2E, and using Kovalic for 3E just felt like a major mistake to me.  So I guess the point is...If you want more humour, go 3E, if you like the idea of it being a more "serious" game (as serious as it can be, anyway), go 2E.

I like the stars. It's the illusion of permanence, I think. I mean, they're always flaring up and caving in and going out. But from here, I can pretend... I can pretend that things last. I can pretend that lives last longer than moments. Gods come, and gods go. Mortals flicker and flash and fade. Worlds don't last and stars and galaxies are transient, fleeting things that twinkle like fireflies and vanish into cold and dust. But I can pretend.

Reply #3 | Published on 24 February 2009 - 09:28:55

3rd edition looks funny and plays as the previous both editions, but does not bring the feeling & atmosphere of my 1st and 2nd edition games. 

Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning.
- Erwin Rommel

Reply #4 | Published on 27 February 2009 - 19:58:28

Well, we lost the Twilight Imperium theme, but they have make some adjustment to race, ships and rules that make it a worthy acquisition.

 

It is even a better acquisition if you want to introduce a son or nephew to gaming, can even draft the whole family to a game or two.

What!

Reply #5 | Published on 05 June 2009 - 10:14:21

Tawnos76 said:

I have the 2nd ed and as a TI3 player I love the Twilight theme and do not want to switch to the 3rd edition.

100% agree, much prefer the 2nd edition I have.  Feels less like Munchkin.

Without Signature

Reply #6 | Published on 16 July 2009 - 11:54:04

I only have the 3rd edition. I can tell you that the new sillier artwork is why I bought the game. Much more friendly to a wife and 13 year old daughter.

I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.  -   Douglas Adams


(kaleljorson7 on boardgamegeek.com)

Reply #7 | Published on 29 July 2009 - 12:02:20
5
0

There are slight rule changes, but some of them can be adopted into 2E.

One of my favourites is drawing 6 ships to start instead of 4 and throwing out any 2 you like.  This helps remove some of the enormous gaps between players that can occur at the beginning of games.  Although I have still seen people manage to pick up 4 scouts, and end up with 2 scouts to start haha.

Nathan Hoel

Reply #8 | Published on 15 August 2009 - 13:28:06

Wow go me for not being in the here and now. I did not even know a second and third edition had come out. When I was fresh out of high school I found the original mag blast and well had a blast playing (no pun intended). It had a nice realistic art scheme which I did love and I also loved the diamond layout and style of attack, however it did seem odd for such art to be used in a game where you had to call your attacks. So my friends always treated it with little respect. In essence we played the game as if it were munchkin.  Memories of playing the one damage one weapon scout ship out on the field always resulted in people saying "DINK" when it fired on another vessel. Other moments of note were unenthused monotone attacks or Batman sound efects such as pow, bam, whapo, kablamo, etc.

Seems the art just caught up with the player's sentiments over the rules. Looks like I might have to snag me a new deck if some needed changes came about. Am I really getting that old already? lol...

Without Signature

Reply #9 | Published on 03 November 2009 - 00:25:19

Although I was originally skeptical of 3rd edition with its cartoonish artwork, I really feel it better capture the feeling of the game.  True it is an awesome space combat game, but when one of the rules is that you have to make sound effects, it loses any seriousness.  I remember playing 2nd edition and always laughing a lot when playing the game, and once I got 3rd, I felt the cartoons worked better than thought.  Of course to each his own.

Without Signature

Reply #10 | Published on 22 March 2010 - 07:51:26
4
0

 I think the third is better. Kovalic did great.

Without Signature
Page 1 of 1 (10 messages) 1
You are here: FFG Forums /  Board and Card Games /  Mag Blast

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS