Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

Star Warsâ„¢: The Card Game - Rules Questions
This is the place to study and discuss the ways of the Forceâ„¢
Moderator: FFGStuartFFG_Ian Topics: 240 | Posts: 1614
quick rancor question
Published on 07 January 2013 - 13:34:44
Does the rancor refresh action go off even if it does not remove a focus. And is this each players turn or only controllers turn?

Without Signature

Page 1 of 1 (11 messages) 1
Reply #1 | Published on 07 January 2013 - 19:51:51

It goes off on the controllers turn the card says "After you refresh,"

And it does not matter if he is exhausted.

exhausted
A card that is exhausted (i.e. has one or more focus
tokens on it) cannot be focused to pay for card effects,
cannot focus to strike, and cannot generate resources.
However, other card abilities of an exhausted card
may still be triggered, and its constant effects (if any)
are still active, as long as such abilities do not require
the card to focus, to be ready,
or are not otherwise
prohibited by the card text.

Nova Scotia LCG Hub

For card search, deckbuilder, articles,podcasts visit: Card Game DB

Reply #2 | Published on 07 January 2013 - 19:55:54

And it's a forced reaction, so it has to happen, even if it takes out one of your own units.

My blog:  The Daily Rich

Reply #3 | Published on 07 January 2013 - 20:01:22
1
0

Relevant card text:

Forced Reaction: After you refresh, destroy the lowest cost non-Vehicle unit in play. (In case of a tie, the active player decides.)

This means, during your refresh phase, after you've removed 1 focus token from each card you control, you must destroy the lowest cost non-Vehicle unit in play. During your oppnent's refresh phase, you do not refresh your cards, so the Forced Reaction of Rancor will not trigger. However, even if Rancor is exhausted after you refresh, the Forced Reaction will trigger.

"Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny." - Yoda, The Empire Strikes Back.

Reply #4 | Published on 08 January 2013 - 14:23:15

So if the Rancor is the lowest cost non-vehicle in play, will he eat himself?

 

I would think yes, but I wanted others' opinions.

 

 

Without Signature
Reply #5 | Published on 08 January 2013 - 14:37:17
0
0
Happy Birthday!

I too would agree that if he was the lowest he would eat himself as it doesn't specify "Other" lowest cost non-vehicle.

Without Signature

Reply #6 | Published on 08 January 2013 - 14:44:03

Probably more like being the only one out there, desperatly seeking to devour someone and then unfortunately in despair tripping over his own feet, breaking his neck  sonreir

But yes, i would assume the same.

Without Signature

Reply #7 | Published on 08 January 2013 - 19:09:47

No assumption needed.  The rancor will indeed eat itself if there are no other potential meals of cost 4 or less available.

Reply #8 | Published on 08 January 2013 - 21:04:09

I maintain that starvation is the more thematic explanation, but now we're just talking semantics. Either way, Rancor is discarded when it's the last non-vehicle unit in play.

Reply #9 | Published on 08 January 2013 - 22:10:32
Budgernaut said:

I maintain that starvation is the more thematic explanation, but now we're just talking semantics. Either way, Rancor is discarded when it's the last non-vehicle unit in play.

Starvation is the better explanation, but not near as funny. ;-)
Reply #10 | Published on 09 January 2013 - 00:10:07

It will eat itself like Pizza the Hutt…

Sent from my TARDIS

Reply #11 | Published on 28 January 2013 - 13:34:42

I wondered if someone was going to use the Pizza the Hut reference.  There it is.

Page 1 of 1 (11 messages) 1

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS