Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

Adventure: Against the Savages
Feedback on the included adventure
Moderator: FFG Andy FischerFFGAntonffgjosh Topics: 18 | Posts: 71
A second chimera?
Published on 26 June 2012 - 04:47:48
0
0

looking for clarification…the mission specific gear for the adventure includes a chimera to provide transport to the refinery.  If the players are playing a mechanised infantry regiment (or any regiment that gives a chimera) are they in effect using 2 for the mission? Same goes for players with a leman russ/hellhound/etc

What do you call a lasgun with a laser sight? Twin-linked.

Page 1 of 1 (13 messages) 1
Reply #1 | Published on 27 June 2012 - 03:29:25
0
0

I gave my Armoured Regiment the Chimera and things went fine.

You can't fit a party of more than 3 players characters inside a Leman Russ anyway (unless the GM is nice enough to give them Sponsons), so having a Chimera means that you don't have players running around unprotected while an Ork Battlewagon goes on a rampage.

 

As for the Mechanized Infantry getting a second Chimera, i think it makes sense, provided you have a large number of Player Characters. Only having one would severely limit the options of a larger squad when attacking or defending the refinery.

Without Signature
Reply #2 | Published on 29 June 2012 - 09:24:28

We're talking about the Departmento Munitorum here. To simulate their tried and true diligent processes of assessing the requirements of your mission, I suggest the following approximation:

Flip a coin - heads, they give you a second chimera; tails, they don't; edge, they decide you should drive to the objective on bicycles.

Ceterum Censeo Dezmond Ignorandum Esse.

Reply #3 | Published on 12 July 2012 - 06:20:28

Remember that the mission Chim is packed to the gills with communications gear, which the PC's default Chim probably doesn't have.

It would make sense to send the second one along then even if they are mech inf.

Without Signature
Reply #4 | Published on 13 July 2012 - 23:37:32

Danayel said:

Remember that the mission Chim is packed to the gills with communications gear, which the PC's default Chim probably doesn't have.

It would make sense to send the second one along then even if they are mech inf.

I like the idea of giving them the second one even if they get one by default, especially since there's always the chance a bad mission start roll results in the loss of the second Chimera.

It also makes the encounter with the Stormtroopers more interesting: do the PCs retain the firepower and protection a second Chimera offers, or do they give it the downed Stormtroopers so they can safely return home?

You gonna get PURGED!

Reply #5 | Published on 14 July 2012 - 06:21:31

Random thought from the other side of the equation…

If the PC's don't include an Operator or someone with Operate (Surface), do they get an NPC driver assigned for the Chimera?

Without signature

Reply #6 | Published on 14 July 2012 - 16:55:15

LuciusT said:

Random thought from the other side of the equation…

If the PC's don't include an Operator or someone with Operate (Surface), do they get an NPC driver assigned for the Chimera?

I'm not sure - it doesn't say so, and knowing the Munitorium, they might well have just ordered for the squad to be given the Chimera, and not given a second thought to whether they'd be able to drive it.

~Yea, Tho I Walk Through The Valley Of The Shadow Of Death, I Shall Fear No Evil~

Rogue Trader, Dark Heresy, Deathwatch, Black Crusade + Only War Playtester

Star Wars: Edge of the Empire Playtester

I do not speak in any official capacity for FFG, all my posts are my own opinion, speculation, etc.

One of Three Founders of Dark Reign

Reply #7 | Published on 14 July 2012 - 17:45:44

 LoL. I guess it depends on the tone you want for your game. Do you want to play up the mindless, souless bureaucracy of the Imperial or play the Guard as a more or less competent, if quirky, fighting force.

Without signature

Reply #8 | Published on 14 July 2012 - 18:16:58

There's nothing to stop both being true - the Imperial Guard are well trained and competent, for the most part, but let down by the bureaucracy of the Imperium.

~Yea, Tho I Walk Through The Valley Of The Shadow Of Death, I Shall Fear No Evil~

Rogue Trader, Dark Heresy, Deathwatch, Black Crusade + Only War Playtester

Star Wars: Edge of the Empire Playtester

I do not speak in any official capacity for FFG, all my posts are my own opinion, speculation, etc.

One of Three Founders of Dark Reign

Reply #9 | Published on 14 July 2012 - 19:48:23

They might also be a more or less competent, if quirky, fighting force in the war of bureaucracy…

Ceterum Censeo Dezmond Ignorandum Esse.

Reply #10 | Published on 14 July 2012 - 20:39:08

MILLANDSON said:

There's nothing to stop both being true - the Imperial Guard are well trained and competent, for the most part, but let down by the bureaucracy of the Imperium.

I just think the point can be overdone. I mean, the case full of Ogryn sized dress uniforms is funny and characterful (and, as I understand it, not altogether inaccurate as military bureaucracy goes sometimes) but at the same time, the Imperial Guard has successfully conquered and held thousands of worlds over ten thousand years. The bureaucracy that supports that can't be completely incompentent.

Without signature

Reply #11 | Published on 14 July 2012 - 23:19:56

I didn't realise forgetting a single armoured personnel carrier crew would count as 'completely incompetent' - I was under the impression it was an innocent mistake, believing that the unit already had a member capable of operating the vehicle.

~Yea, Tho I Walk Through The Valley Of The Shadow Of Death, I Shall Fear No Evil~

Rogue Trader, Dark Heresy, Deathwatch, Black Crusade + Only War Playtester

Star Wars: Edge of the Empire Playtester

I do not speak in any official capacity for FFG, all my posts are my own opinion, speculation, etc.

One of Three Founders of Dark Reign

Reply #12 | Published on 15 July 2012 - 16:47:20
0
0

MILLANDSON said:

I didn't realise forgetting a single armoured personnel carrier crew would count as 'completely incompetent' - I was under the impression it was an innocent mistake, believing that the unit already had a member capable of operating the vehicle.

Does not only giving not giving them a chimera, or any of their mission specific gear, but then demanding they return a piece of standard kit sound for complete incompentence?

which is what 4+ Degrees of failure on the mission specific logistics test does. Assume it is their first mission players will run, to roll for the mission specific gear, the players are probably going to be rolling with a logistics rating of around 20.  (Base 10. +10 mission specific. -10 violent impasse.  +10 important mission)

making 4+ degrees of failure at 40% chance.

What do you call a lasgun with a laser sight? Twin-linked.

Reply #13 | Published on 16 July 2012 - 04:47:47

 It happened to the 273rd Malfian Mechanized Infantry: We got no comms equiped Chimera; no Demo Charges; and my medic had to return his lamp because the new fish getting brought in needed reading lights.  

Granted, we still had our Chimera, 'Pandora', but I like the way the IG's "Profit Factor" works for just that reason ^_^

 

Deathwatch Tactical Creon, of the Dark Angels : "Commerce is a sin, feudalism is the righteous path"

Page 1 of 1 (13 messages) 1

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS