Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

Android: Netrunner The Card Game
Hack into the future.
Moderator: FFGAntonffgjoshFFGStuartFFG_Ian Topics: 438 | Posts: 4312
Expansions - Thoughts and Wishes
Published on 19 August 2012 - 00:08:05

 So, this will be the first LCG I will be investing in, and I'm loving what's been presented so far for material.  As I wait for the core sets to make it to retail shops, I gotta wonder what to expect from the future.

Looking through the material for other LCGs, it looks like there's Deluxe expansions and Basic packs.  The Deluxe Expansions run about $30, the Basic Packs run $10 - $15.  So, for those that have been playing other titles, what can we expect?

Also, what do we want to see in the expansions?  New mechanics, variations on what we've seen?

Page 1 of 4 (56 messages) 1 2 3 4 ...Last page »
Reply #1 | Published on 19 August 2012 - 07:58:56

So far, there's been no official comment regarding expansions for Android: Netrunner.

Considering it's a re-imagining of the Netrunner CCG, I think it's most likely that at least the first expansion will feature plenty of updated 'reprints'.

To get an overview of the CCG cards check out www.netrunneronline.com/set/limited/cards/ and www.netrunneronline.com/set/proteus/.

First priority should be to improve the deck-building by providing variety for all of the basic 'functions' in the game (Agendas, Icebreakers, Cred-Generation, etc.). Introducing 'new' mechanics (or factions) can wait.

 

Without signature

Reply #2 | Published on 19 August 2012 - 12:07:39

My wish is that they only release big-box expansions. Chapter packs seem very annoying and expensive, in the long run. With the bigger boxes every player is bound to find something of their liking in each of them.

 

Other than that I hope that the NRA team takes a serious look at the fan expansions that has been created over the years. There's bound to be some interesting stuff in those, considering how much time & love was put into them.

Without Signature

Reply #3 | Published on 19 August 2012 - 14:43:38
0
0

No new mechanics should be introduced. The way cards function now and how the rules work create a solid game. When games start doing this they get away from themselves and can change completely from the original play. I only expect new cards and maybe factions that expand upon the game. Nothing crazy.

Without Signature
Reply #4 | Published on 19 August 2012 - 15:13:34

Dez1013 said:

No new mechanics should be introduced. The way cards function now and how the rules work create a solid game. When games start doing this they get away from themselves and can change completely from the original play. I only expect new cards and maybe factions that expand upon the game. Nothing crazy.

Then I guess you never bought an expansion for a FFG game before.

Without Signature

Reply #5 | Published on 19 August 2012 - 16:17:42
0
0

pastah_rhymez said:

Other than that I hope that the NRA team takes a serious look at the fan expansions that has been created over the years. There's bound to be some interesting stuff in those, considering how much time & love was put into them.

 

I doubt FFG will intentionally look for ideas from fan supplements. Copyrights are a slippery slope even if authors in question might co-operate for the most part. A lot of television writers do not read fan forums/fiction to avoid being influenced by them. No matter how good this material is, the bottom line is that corporations dare not to use it without explicit permission.

Besides you can only take their card designs from their cold dead hands for NRA 

 

Without Signature
Reply #6 | Published on 19 August 2012 - 20:00:30

Mikko Leho said:

I doubt FFG will intentionally look for ideas from fan supplements. Copyrights are a slippery slope even if authors in question might co-operate for the most part. A lot of television writers do not read fan forums/fiction to avoid being influenced by them. No matter how good this material is, the bottom line is that corporations dare not to use it without explicit permission.

 

But for games it's different. As long as you don't use any art or any of the wordings you can take whatever you want. Look at what David Sirlin did with his game Flash Duel (taking Knizias design from En Garde). FFG is a nice company because they say "hey, we're gonna steal yo shit, mmmmkay?" before they do it. They don't *have* to do that, but it's what they do. Taking this into consideration I would say that the NRA team can safely peek at the fan expansions

Without Signature

Reply #7 | Published on 19 August 2012 - 21:38:46

pastah_rhymez said:

My wish is that they only release big-box expansions. Chapter packs seem very annoying and expensive, in the long run. With the bigger boxes every player is bound to find something of their liking in each of them.

 

I can see chapter packs being good if they function on the model I've been looking at in the other LCGs; Specific theme and focus for the bulk of the cards offered, combined with a small boost in cards for all factions.  (NOTE: those with more experience with LCGs… please correct me if I am wrong)  Buy the packs if they work for your strategy, or pass them over if you want to focus resources elsewhere.  Hell, I kind of like the idea of the chapter packs because it might allow me to do some card trading of unneeded cards with others without having to constantly worry about the random aspect dictating when I might get another copy of that card again.

Still deciding on new cards… haven't had a chance to read over all the info on what's in the core set.

Reply #8 | Published on 20 August 2012 - 00:45:49
0
0

pastah_rhymez said:

But for games it's different. As long as you don't use any art or any of the wordings you can take whatever you want. Look at what David Sirlin did with his game Flash Duel (taking Knizias design from En Garde). FFG is a nice company because they say "hey, we're gonna steal yo shit, mmmmkay?" before they do it. They don't *have* to do that, but it's what they do.

 

It is funny that you mention Flash Duel. Reiner Knizia is not happy with Flash Duel:

javascript:void(0);/*1345441140823*/

Christian Petersen of FFG was not thrilled when it was not an official license:

javascript:void(0);/*1345441305448*/

Of course you can do this kind of copying legally and to some extend morally, but I do not think FFG wants fan forums to light up with messages like: "FFG stole my card design!!!". If you could somehow license those card designs, then I could see some headway but else I think the design team will steer clear away from them.

Without Signature
Reply #9 | Published on 20 August 2012 - 05:04:24

 They recently switched Call of Cthulu to a new distribution model, getting rid of the monthly packs and instead doing an expansion box every four months, so it's a possibility. I do expect them to go with the "traditional" monthly pack / occasional expansion box model that they are using for Game of Thrones and Lord of the Rings, and I think it'll work well for this game.

In other games, the monthly packs come in sets of 6, so I expect it'll be the same for Netrunner. In Game of Thrones, each set focuses on a specific theme or mechanic, sometimes introducing new mechanics, and each monthly pack contains cards for every faction. Again, this I expect to work very similarly in Netrunner. Game of Thrones had 6 box expansions, each with a focus on one of the factions. This I'm not sure about -- they might do something similar for Netrunner (netting us at least 7 expansion boxes), but I wouldn't be surprised at all if the expansion boxes worked differently for Netrunner. Maybe looking at what Call of Cthulu did would be more telling, because I think Netrunner is more similar to that than to Game of Thrones, probably.

Reply #10 | Published on 20 August 2012 - 08:32:01

Mikko Leho said:

It is funny that you mention Flash Duel. Reiner Knizia is not happy with Flash Duel:

javascript:void(0);/*1345441140823*/

Christian Petersen of FFG was not thrilled when it was not an official license:

javascript:void(0);/*1345441305448*/

Of course you can do this kind of copying legally and to some extend morally, but I do not think FFG wants fan forums to light up with messages like: "FFG stole my card design!!!". If you could somehow license those card designs, then I could see some headway but else I think the design team will steer clear away from them.

Why did you bring up this old shitstorm? Didn't you see how I elegantly danced around it? Bad publicity token for you

Without Signature

Reply #11 | Published on 21 August 2012 - 02:04:59

 Personally I'm hoping for monthly 'data packs.'. I need to be able to modify my agenda selection soonest. 

Reply #12 | Published on 22 August 2012 - 03:19:29

 I'm a bit disappointed FFG didn't reintroduced Hidden resources. They allowed the runner to bluff and it was a great addition in the old card game.

I hope they'll add it in an expansion (probably in a deluxe box)

Ellyrik

Reply #13 | Published on 22 August 2012 - 03:46:45

IIRC, the Resource-Hidden Keyword was only introduced in expansions Proteus and Classic. Hidden resources are a fairly large change to Runner dynamics, so it would seem prudent to repeat history and save this feature for a big box.

What I would like to see is further exploration into Bad Publicity. Given the huge change this mechanic has undergone it seems a little underrepresented. A lot of Runner cards revolved around Bad Publicity, tieing in with anti-Black Ops, so I'm interested as to how this will be adapted.

In Memoriam: Lest we Forget their Brave Sacrifice, Citizens of Arkham!

Diane Stanley:  irretrievably lost in both time and space

Wilson Richards: swallowed by a moonbeast

Agnes Baker: suicide, induced by a feverish paranoia

Roland Banks: Missing, presumed dead.  Last seen in Innsmouth.

Charlie Kane: Stumbled into the maw of a moonbeast in the Black Caves

Heroes One and All

 

Reply #14 | Published on 22 August 2012 - 14:18:08

 Yeah, hidden "Bluffing" cards for the Runner will likely be reserved for the first deluxe expansion.  I forget how they all worked in the original run of Proteus, but it might be an interesting method for Runners to fight back against Tags attempting to trash cards, like how ambush cards in the Corp vaults lure in Runners.

How prevalent are cards that redirect Virus and Damage tokens?  That seems like a ripe area for playing with mechanics without needing to re-write the entire game.  Damn, I wish I has a box set already so I could be looking at all the existing variations.

Another thought:  Will we see variations on Runner IDs based on their "racial" template?  ie; will there be advantages seen commonly among Bioroids/Cyborgs/Gene-splicers/Base Humans?  Would there be a use for cards that affect a Runner based on what "race" they may be?

Reply #15 | Published on 22 August 2012 - 16:21:50

I think they should be called "Patches" and the back should read like patch notes. Have the first cycle have packs v1.1-1.6 and the second have v2.1-2.6. Have deluxe expansions be called "System Upgrades". I also think they should expand upon current gameplay mechanics and not introduce any new ones for a cycle or two, but give us identities so that we can try new things.

 

[QUOTE efidm=702580]
Another thought: Will we see variations on Runner IDs based on their "racial" template? ie; will there be advantages seen commonly among Bioroids/Cyborgs/Gene-splicers/Base Humans? Would there be a use for cards that affect a Runner based on what "race" they may be?

[/QUOTE]

 

Bioroid runners would be so cooool.

A Lannister ALWAYS pays his debts...

Co-Host of The Domain Drain Podcast. 

 

Page 1 of 4 (56 messages) 1 2 3 4 ...Last page »

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS