| Register Now | |
| My Points | |
| My Games | |
Had a "conversation" with one of my gaming partners about how blocking works in this game…. He reckons that if you block a monster and then the card is destroyed teh block is still counted as defended.. while I think this is incorrect….
Example…
Sleeping Sentry
or
Pathless Country
There are many other cards that can kill allies and heroes b4 the block happens… anyway, if these shadow effects kill the defender say a 4attack warg,,, then the attack is in fact undefended and the 4 dmg has to go on the hero… as the attack is now undefended.. correct?
"People should be less concerned with whether or not they are being insulted, and more concerned with whether or not it's the truth."
"I respect you too much as a human being to respect your ridiculous beliefs."
Sick of FFG terrible forum software? Why not try chatting at CardGameDB a site dedicated to Living Card Games and at the moment criminally under populated. Lets all move to that forum!!
| Page 1 of 1 (5 messages) | 1 |
booored said:
if these shadow effects kill the defender say a 4attack warg,,, then the attack is in fact undefended and the 4 dmg has to go on the hero… as the attack is now undefended.. correct?
Correct. If your partner doesn't believe it, cite p. 18 of the rules:
If a defending character leaves play or is removed from combat before damage is assigned, the attack is considered undefended.
the determination of defenders and the defense itself are two different phases.
yeah, I knew it.. it is just after a while he had me confused … lol…
"People should be less concerned with whether or not they are being insulted, and more concerned with whether or not it's the truth."
"I respect you too much as a human being to respect your ridiculous beliefs."
Sick of FFG terrible forum software? Why not try chatting at CardGameDB a site dedicated to Living Card Games and at the moment criminally under populated. Lets all move to that forum!!
| Page 1 of 1 (5 messages) | 1 |