Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Gather your heroes and face the coming darkness!
Moderator: FFGStuartFFG_IanGeckoThe Spaniard Topics: 2431 | Posts: 29651
Two Core Sets for Four Players?
Published on 23 March 2011 - 03:34:43
Page 3 of 3 (37 messages) « First page... 2 3
Reply #31 | Published on 19 April 2011 - 11:02:57
0
1

But there's one reason why you might want to buy a second core set that no one seems to be talking about: customizing the encounter deck. To me the draw of this game (besides all of the obvious ones) is that you can continually balance it to your liking. You customize your player decks to conquer the encounter deck, and then you customize the encounter deck to conquer the player decks, and on and on for virtually infinite replay value. It doesn't seem like you could do much customizing of the encounter deck with just one core set (granted, my copies are still on their way).

Without Signature

Reply #32 | Published on 19 April 2011 - 13:23:15

conykchameleon said:

But there's one reason why you might want to buy a second core set that no one seems to be talking about: customizing the encounter deck. To me the draw of this game (besides all of the obvious ones) is that you can continually balance it to your liking. You customize your player decks to conquer the encounter deck, and then you customize the encounter deck to conquer the player decks, and on and on for virtually infinite replay value. It doesn't seem like you could do much customizing of the encounter deck with just one core set (granted, my copies are still on their way).

I'd rather wait for the new cards in the APs. The more different cards there are the more possibilities you have to customize stuff. I enjoy using semi-random decks, i.e. there's a core of about 36 cards (12x3) that are fixed and have been carefully selected to work well together. Then I add 14 random cards (of the same factions used in the fixed deck). This creates decks that work pretty well but still have this fun surprise factor that can force you to come up with new combos or just play cards you'd otherwise never use.

I think this should work marvelously with encounter decks: Use a fixed base (i.e. the standard encounter deck) then add a bunch of random cards from the other APs. Maybe you'd have to tweak some other things to make it work well, e.g. to compensate for a bigger encounter deck, but I'm sure it's doable.

Without signature

Reply #33 | Published on 19 April 2011 - 17:19:38

Eh, maybe I won't even want to go three player anyway.  I wonder if the game gets more complex and takes longer if you go beyond 2 player.  It might be simpler just to play 2 player games anyhow. 

Without Signature

Reply #34 | Published on 19 April 2011 - 18:26:07

I am not usually a fan of FFG marketing strategies, but in this case I think that given this game can be played solo quite well, buying two core sets if you have four friends to play with is not a waste of cards. Just let one of your friends take the extra Encounter/Quest cards back home to train up his deck handling abilities a bit for next gaming session.

 

And having a fairly succesful single sphere deck definitely needs two sets. Most cards (the best ones usually) of each Sphere don´t come with three copies. You want those for the hard quests for sure.

 

 

Without Signature

Reply #35 | Published on 20 April 2011 - 16:51:10

Acererak said:

And having a fairly succesful single sphere deck definitely needs two sets. Most cards (the best ones usually) of each Sphere don´t come with three copies. You want those for the hard quests for sure.

So does that mean there is actually a purpose in having three sets?  I'm still confused on that as well.  I thought the new LCG format was going to have 3 copies of every card.  Will the Adventure Packs for LOTR be back to having single copies now? 

Without Signature

Reply #36 | Published on 20 April 2011 - 17:20:17

nelsonbaggins said:

 

Acererak said:

 

And having a fairly succesful single sphere deck definitely needs two sets. Most cards (the best ones usually) of each Sphere don´t come with three copies. You want those for the hard quests for sure.

 

 

So does that mean there is actually a purpose in having three sets?  I'm still confused on that as well.  I thought the new LCG format was going to have 3 copies of every card.  Will the Adventure Packs for LOTR be back to having single copies now? 

 

 

No, no..  nothing is changing. The Adventure Packs will continue to have 3 copies of each card.

 

The Core Sets have NEVER contained three of each card. That's why people who are in the competitive games buy multiple sets of the Core Games. But that only applies to the Core Sets  in the other of the LCGs. The rationale for doing in Lord of the Rings is having enough cards to serve the needs of 4 players (though as has been discussed, there will still be some extras).

 

In fact, in Call of Cthulthu, they are reprinting some of the original CCG "packs" (from before the LCG concept was implemented) to have three of each card, whereas before they only had one.

Without Signing There Can Be No Signature

Reply #37 | Published on 21 April 2011 - 03:34:42

Watcher said:

No, no..  nothing is changing. The Adventure Packs will continue to have 3 copies of each card.

 

minor correction: They will have three copies of all player cards (excepting Heroes which will come with a single copy each). Encounter cards can come in any number, assumably from 1 to 5, just as they do in the core set.

Without signature

Page 3 of 3 (37 messages) « First page... 2 3

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS