Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

2. AGoT Rules Discussion
The place to discuss rules, clarifications, bannings and erratta.
Moderator: FFG NateFFGAntonffgjafferffgjoshFFGStuartFFG_IanGeckoGood_TravelerThe Spaniard Topics: 3679 | Posts: 19279
Ambush from the plains
by LFenix
Published on 12 January 2013 - 13:34:24
Page 2 of 2 (18 messages) « First page... 1 2
Reply #16 | Published on 15 January 2013 - 00:38:54

He did say (in another thread I'm too lazy too look for this morning), that "put into play" effects can be used with copies of unique cards in play or multiples copies of unique cards. The setup rule has obviously no bearing there, the duping rules don't forbid it (the control/ownership/dead pile restrictions can, though), and in that case, extra copies do become dupes.

Without Signature

Reply #17 | Published on 15 January 2013 - 15:11:55
2
61

stormwolf27 said:

What's your take then on dupes from No Use for Grief, then? As I understand it, it should work, since you're searching for all sand snakes and "putting in play" all found characters, and I've seen no valid argument against it… yet.
No Use for Grief can put Sand Snakes into play duped if you have multiple copies of them in your deck when triggering the event. The fact that you are putting the "original" and the "dupe" into play with the same effect doesn't change the underlying practice/rule of "'put into play' effects can be used to duplicate unique characters."

This whole thread is pretty entertaining to us old-timers because people are arguing concepts/cards/effects that were settled long ago. The lack of clarity in some of the answers may simply be from the fact that this whole "put into play"/dupe thing is so ingrained, people don't really think about it.

There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness.'

 - Dave Berry

Reply #18 | Published on 16 January 2013 - 13:34:24

ktom said:

This whole thread is pretty entertaining to us old-timers because people are arguing concepts/cards/effects that were settled long ago. The lack of clarity in some of the answers may simply be from the fact that this whole "put into play"/dupe thing is so ingrained, people don't really think about it.

It probably has more to do with them not reprinting the core set with the damn FAQ in it… Or did they do that? Why haven't they edited the rulebook. It's silly.

It's like hitting out of a phone booth!!!

REEEEEEEJECTEEEEEEEEEEEEED!!!!!!!!

Page 2 of 2 (18 messages) « First page... 1 2

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS