| Register Now | |
| My Points | |
| My Games | |
or I am over-sensitve due to the seeming disdain for C&C games in light of what appears to be happening with BattleLore?
I'll go with over-sensitive.
Half the world starves,
Half the world bloats,
Half the world sits on the other half and gloats
| Page 1 of 1 (4 messages) | 1 |
toddrew said:
or I am over-sensitve due to the seeming disdain for C&C games in light of what appears to be happening with BattleLore?
I'll go with over-sensitive.
Then again
OD
The way of iron and the ax,
this Dwarf's tale nears told.
Now extract their cruel tax,
the stone grows cold..cold...cold
toddrew said:
or I am over-sensitve due to the seeming disdain for C&C games in light of what appears to be happening with BattleLore?
I'll go with over-sensitive.
I'll agree with you. You're being over-sensitive!
Founder, Ronan of the Mild Fan Club. Join today!

I was getting a little growly, but I think the thread title helped me laugh (if only to myself ;) ) it off a bit.
Half the world starves,
Half the world bloats,
Half the world sits on the other half and gloats
I have to admit, when I first saw this game advertised, having just been reading about the upcoming C & C Napoleonic game, I thought it was a direct competitive blow as well. Nothing wrong with that, but Napoleon's battles seems so out of keeping with FFG's latest trend in games that it felt odd. But FFG has every right to make any kind of game they want, and if they can do ToI (which I wish they would support more), they can certainly do Napoleonics. Frankly,if they're doing Nineteenth Century warfare, though, I'd have preferred a ToI type tactical Civil War game.
Without signature
| Page 1 of 1 (4 messages) | 1 |