Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

Rogue Trader Gamemasters
GMs discuss your campaigns here
Moderator: FFG Andy FischerFFG DanielCFFGMarkFFG_Sam StewartGeckoMack MartinmauglirThe Spaniardynnen Topics: 723 | Posts: 6632
Power armor player
Published on 28 October 2012 - 09:52:12
Page 7 of 8 (111 messages) « First page... 5 6 7 8 ...Last page »
Reply #91 | Published on 16 December 2012 - 19:28:15
Reply #92 | Published on 17 December 2012 - 00:00:14
3
3

HappyDaze said:

lurkeroutthere said:

 

Question if it was their intent that inherantly meant the best quality modifer didn't need to be paid for why didn't they just say that?

 

 

They did. It's quite obvious if you understand the meaning of 'inherent(ly)' and how it's used in the sentence. Perhaps they failed to dumb it down and make it explicit to those that fail at vocabulary, but that's not really a problem with the language used so much as the ability of some of the readers.

 

…..so wait, in leiu of an actual argument or citation "your too stupid to see my point" is going to be your final answer? Forgive me if I hope for something more concrete, some of those other citations from the books you were going to come up with for instance.

 

 

Carpe Jugular

Reply #93 | Published on 17 December 2012 - 02:09:15
9
2

lurkeroutthere said:

HappyDaze said:

 

lurkeroutthere said:

 

Question if it was their intent that inherantly meant the best quality modifer didn't need to be paid for why didn't they just say that?

 

 

They did. It's quite obvious if you understand the meaning of 'inherent(ly)' and how it's used in the sentence. Perhaps they failed to dumb it down and make it explicit to those that fail at vocabulary, but that's not really a problem with the language used so much as the ability of some of the readers.

 

 

 

…..so wait, in leiu of an actual argument or citation "your too stupid to see my point" is going to be your final answer? Forgive me if I hope for something more concrete, some of those other citations from the books you were going to come up with for instance.

 

 

You seem to have made up your mind, so I really don't feel the need to bother with the issue any further. I just picked up Only War and Tome of Blood, and that's much more interesting to me right now than attempting to educate you. If you want more, I'd suggest beginning with the idea that I might be correct and exploring it to see if it works out - that's essentially how I came to the conclusion I did.

Reply #94 | Published on 17 December 2012 - 15:08:56
9
2

I think the easiest way to handle it would be to just treat Lathe-wrought Armour as its own entry with Near Unique Avaliability. This gives a suit a -50 Acquisition Modifier (based upon not modifying for Scale for Near Unique and Unique items). This is equivalent to outfitting an entire Division (2,000-5,000 suits) with Common Craftsmanship Power Armour or a Platoon (10-30 suits) with Best Craftsmanship Power Armour. That's pretty damn impressive, and there's no good reason that a single suit of Lathe-wrought Armour needs to be any harder to get ahold of than that.

Reply #95 | Published on 17 December 2012 - 15:19:48
3
0

Inherently the simplest solution is to follow the rules as they are written.

Without Signature

Reply #96 | Published on 17 December 2012 - 16:13:03
I am wondering if you two are in the same game? If not, then it doesn't matter. The interpretation your own group wants to use. Some random other person's interpretation of a matter that can clearly be interpreted multiple ways should not matter so much to you, that a friendly discussion devolves into insults. Even if the author came on here and stated how it should be, you could still use your prefered interpretation. I have before, simply because it made sense to me.
Without Signature
Reply #97 | Published on 17 December 2012 - 16:36:59
0
0

Cryhavok said:

I am wondering if you two are in the same game? If not, then it doesn't matter. The interpretation your own group wants to use. Some random other person's interpretation of a matter that can clearly be interpreted multiple ways should not matter so much to you, that a friendly discussion devolves into insults. Even if the author came on here and stated how it should be, you could still use your prefered interpretation. I have before, simply because it made sense to me.

 

QFT.

Without Signature

Reply #98 | Published on 17 December 2012 - 19:07:32
9
2

Fresnel said:

Inherently the simplest solution is to follow the rules as they are written.

You have begun using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Reply #99 | Published on 17 December 2012 - 19:18:48
3
0

'I don't know what you mean by "glory",' Alice said.

Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. 'Of course you don't — till I tell you. I meant "there's a nice knock-down argument for you!"'
'But "glory" doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument",' Alice objected.
 
'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.'
 
'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean so many different things.'
 
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master — that's all.'

Without Signature

Reply #100 | Published on 22 December 2012 - 09:50:30
2
3

I have to say that I post here with the regularity of a major asteroid hitting the surface of the Earth, but I simply had to log in and reward you with most heart-felt plaudits I can just about muster, guys!

Where discussions on these boards are usually rather tame, predictable and pragmatic — this has been a marvelous beacon of inspiring emotion amidst that darkness of practicality! Thank you!

.

Reply #101 | Published on 03 January 2013 - 03:29:40

First off, this thread is stupid, I am stupid for reading all  7 pages and Fresnel is the worst of all.

the

For in book proof, look to the Inquisitor's Handbook for the lathe-wrought blade UPGRADE, it is a way of MAKING a blade into best quality weapon, cheap for some, very expensive for most. It says nothing about the quality of the weapon going in, the same with Lathe Wrought Armor. Though it may be from a different system, it concerns the lathe worlds forging/reforging an item to be of better than best quality due to the unique properties, it replaces best quality on a normal item, by giving it a new and improved best quality.

Second, RAI, if it was meant for you to use both, it would be impossible to get one. At that point, why even have it in the book? Think about the logic from that end as well. When you see the previous incarnation of a lathe upgrade and then the intent of the creators (a rare and hard to get upgrade, but, ultimately, obtainable by most players), I hope you can see the answer

Without Signature

Reply #102 | Published on 08 January 2013 - 16:51:36
4
0

Fresnel said:

 Storm trooper carapace is 6 - 7 at Best Quality. Is +1 or 2 armour rating such a big deal? Or is the rest of the party running around in light armour?

 

 

This.  This right here.

 

Power armor is a godsend compared to vlak vests and xeno mesh.  Compared to what a rogue trader ought to have, it's a bunch of penalties, +20 strength (so only useful if you're melee) in exchange for a whole extra point of armor.  A well decked out stormtrooper will be faster, quieter, bite just as hard, and have a measly 1 AP less.

Power armor is useful, but never underestimate getting hit by 1 more shot 50% of the time on semi auto, and 100% of the time on full auto.

Don't worry too much about balancing for it; if you can't hurt a target in power armor, you couldn't hurt one in most other armors as well.

Without Signature

Reply #103 | Published on 09 January 2013 - 02:15:51

What about light Power armor? Many players I know prefer it for being like a more powerful carapace, with a bonus to Str and same size class and the +1 AP to base carapace, the +20 Str, +2 AP and +10 to hit of normal power armor don't seem to be worth it in comparison. That said, a vac sealed carapace is a damn solid choice

Without Signature

Reply #104 | Published on 09 January 2013 - 08:10:15
9
2

Cymbel said:

That said, a vac sealed carapace is a damn solid choice

It's my favourite choice (especially at Good Craftsmanship so there's no punctures/leaks), and if you like the power bit, there's an upgrade that does that too.

Reply #105 | Published on 16 January 2013 - 22:18:36

Looking at that entry again, I now want some future RT PC to have power assisted feudal plate….

Without Signature

Page 7 of 8 (111 messages) « First page... 5 6 7 8 ...Last page »

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS