Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

Warhammer Invasion Deck Building
A who's who of how to
Moderator: FFGHataFFGMarkGeckoGood_TravelerThe Spaniard Topics: 427 | Posts: 3438
Deck Size
Published on 12 October 2009 - 09:46:04
Page 3 of 3 (35 messages) « First page... 2 3
Reply #31 | Published on 28 October 2009 - 10:54:52

Okay I misunderstood you. I thought you were deploying almost exclusively to your BZ with Chaos, in which case I could not fathom how you were winning games. Investing heavily into your KZ and QZ early and then working the BZ makes a lot more sense and fits with my own experiences.

"I am the Prince of Dorne. Men seek my favor."

 

Reply #32 | Published on 28 October 2009 - 11:44:06

dormouse said:

Okay I misunderstood you. I thought you were deploying almost exclusively to your BZ with Chaos, in which case I could not fathom how you were winning games. Investing heavily into your KZ and QZ early and then working the BZ makes a lot more sense and fits with my own experiences.

 

Yeah I merely meant that it seems useless for Chaos or Orks (and probably the other 2 also) to invest in a lot of 'defensively placed' units. It just denies attack force.

Reply #33 | Published on 28 October 2009 - 12:14:48

That isn't precisely true though. Chaos doesn't require a lot of units in the BZ because it's ability to corrupt your opponents units. A small force without a lot of power can totally hammer away at an opponent with a well defended zone and leave the capitol burning.

Empire likewise does not need to necessarily deploy heavily into the BZ because of their ability to move around units to whatever will give them the best strategic advantage. I should also point out that with counterstrike, they can do a really good job or destroying units while remaining defensive allowing a smaller deployment in the BZ to wreck some havoc (especially when helped by Forced March and Judgment of Verena).

"I am the Prince of Dorne. Men seek my favor."

 

Reply #34 | Published on 29 October 2009 - 05:31:46

Hmmm atm corrupting helps but it rarely locks down the enemy defences entirely.
Hence I prefer to do as much damage as quickly as possible. Hence I focus on battlefield armies to quickly overwhelm zones.
 

Reply #35 | Published on 08 November 2009 - 09:46:04

dormouse said:

How has that worked for you with Chaos? I've found that type of setup for Chaos pretty much ensure that my head is handed to me by Dwarves or Orcs.

Well I've only played 5 or so games + 1 using the draft rules.
But Chaos can work against Dwarves. To know wether they have problems i'll need to play with that setup more.
Which seems likely as my brother is leaning towards Dwarves while I'll be a Chaos (and DE) player for sure.

Orcs vs Chaos... I have a feeling atm the Orcs have the advantage. Chaos is offensive with a hint of subtlety, Orcs are just great in offence. Their support cards simply rock within the knockdown archetype build. And I always found knockdown one of the nastiest archetypes in any deck. Simply because there is more room for 'error' or rather it is easier to make less errors. And atm the potential for mass power token output seems very high with the Orcs.

Page 3 of 3 (35 messages) « First page... 2 3

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS