| Register Now | |
| My Points | |
| My Games | |
| Page 2 of 2 (18 messages) | « First page... 1 2 |
Maus said:
If I remember correctly, Battlelore is more troop and formation focused and M'44 more towards maneuver and terrain.
Maus
Yes, that is a more accurate one line summary.
- Brian <><
aka ColtsFan76
I find it boring because of the lack of a difference between the units, one cant tell me that if they included this it would have made it harder because Battlelore is such an easy system.
This of course is the History Buff in me not liking that theres only 1 kind of tank for each side and that ANY infantrymen can take out these tanks...for my pesonal tastes there need to be some classes of units as not just any unit of infantry could take out tanks, they had to have anti-armor weapons etc.
As a rule of thumb if your a big Military History Buff you'll probably not like Memoir '44 and is in my opinion a step down from the Battelore system in terms of accuracy.
"Spartan spawn, sworn, raised for warring."
Luftwaffe Flak said:
As a rule of thumb if your a big Military History Buff you'll probably not like Memoir '44 and is in my opinion a step down from the Battelore system in terms of accuracy.
That hasn't been my experience. There are quite a few Military Histroy Buffs that I know that love M44.
I know of military history buff grognards that see M44 as a step down but they think most of the whole C&C system is a waste of time.
Different strokes for different folks....
- Brian <><
aka ColtsFan76
| Page 2 of 2 (18 messages) | « First page... 1 2 |