Im Proud to introduce to you those magnificent ladies:

Embrace the end of days!

 You just lost 1 Sanity ! :)

I really like the idea and those design. You should have done some scenario with those Heralds, it would be a nice campaign.

quick note: "recently delayed" doesn't mean anything in Arkham terminology, I have no idea what you mean by it.

Avi_dreader said:

Closest movement phase after being delayed when you can move.

This is done to prevent player from being permanently stuck in one location until the end of the game.

You know  I just thought of situation where Mark Herriggan would fail a Will check with some chick, so she'd get delayed and he'd not

MyNeighbourTrololo said:

I think what he means is there is no convention for that in the game text, and therefore your wording is going to be confusing.  Plus, it's irrelevant.  If they were delayed last turn but are not this turn, then they are free to leave this turn.  If they choose not to leave, then they risk being stuck there again.  And if someone else moves there before they have a chance to move, thus risking that result, then it's still a conscious decision made by the group (it's a co-op game, after all).  So I don't think that "recently delayed" distinction is necessary at all.

Grudunza said:

If you both were delayed, then you stand up your next movement phase but do not move, so you're still at the same location and still forced to pass this check or be delayed AGAIN.

Grudunza said:

Basically, it needs to say something like "delayed in the previous turn," not "recently," recently is meaningless here.  It could mean last turn, it could mean five turns ago.  It's completely subjective.  Game instructions should not contain ambiguity, but this is beyond ambiguity, it's beyond confusing, it's bad communication (i.e. not really communication at all, just a presumption that others will think of using the card the same way you imagined using it despite its lack of clarity).

MyNeighbourTrololo said:

Okay, you're right.  But as Avi suggests, "delayed last turn" would be a better way to say it.  Or how about making them LITAS?  That might be an amusing way to depict that.

Grudunza said:

That would be pretty funny.

Grudunza said:

MNT, would you mind pointing me at the site where you found the pictures of those ladies?

Try "seven deadly sins" in google image search. That's how I found em. 

Yeah, got them!                      

These really look awesome, like amped-up 'Corruptions'. Only 2 complaints:

1) I don't like mixing 'Christian' mythology with the Mythos, even though HPL himself did it (Dreams in the Witch House)

2) "Lust" is purely hetero-oriented. In my Arkham experience "The World Ain't Big Enough" Relationship card ALWAYS goes to 2 characters of the same sex, and I've only ever had female Investigators 'Delayed' by the 'Child of the Goat' monster.

So ignore my complaints and keep making awesome stuff!

I'm an atheist, so for me both crhistian and lovecraftian mythologies are equal Mythos as you said.

And isn't there church and holy water and rosary and sister Mary?